Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Advanced Analytical Techniques for Microbial Detection in Poultry Processing: Enhancing Food Safety Compliance in the U.S.

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Prabu, Marudhar Kesari Jain College for Women (Autonomous), India.

(2) Hanaa Salih Abd Ali Alrammah, University of Baghdad, Iraq and University of Plymouth, UK.

(3) Mohammad Zahid Mustafa, University of Balochistan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Prabu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanaa Salih Abd Ali Alrammah, Iraq, UK) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad Zahid Mustafa, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of the Nutritional, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Chromolaena odorata Leaves

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Government College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gireesh Tripathi, Shri Krishna University, India.

(2) Joenil G. Frayco, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Philippines.

(3) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gireesh Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joenil G. Frayco, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Perceived Stress, Sex, and Quality of Life among Academic University Staff in Lagos State: An Empirical Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Egbita Peace Unekwuojo, Salem University, Nigeria.

(2) K.Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

(3) Yousef Alarabiat, Amman Arab University, Amman-Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Egbita Peace Unekwuojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Sindhura, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yousef Alarabiat, Amman-Jordan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Multi-level Clustering Framework for Cybersecurity Risk Stratification in Healthcare: A Dynamic, Overlapping Approach to Threat Classification and Mitigation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Suresh, SRM Institute of Science & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Chukwunweike, United Kingdom.

(2) Priyanka Neelakrishnan, Enterprise Cybersecurity Product Leader and Independent Researcher, United States of America.

(3) Anindya Bose, Brainware University, India.

(4) Sanjay Kumar, K L University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Chukwunweike, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyanka Neelakrishnan, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anindya Bose, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sanjay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Access to Market Information for Smallholder Indigenous Chicken Farmers Improvement in Misungwi District, Mwanza Region, Tanzania

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Beguinot, University of Bourgogne, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Juma Mhina, Tengeru Institute of Community Development, Tanzania.

(2) Chala Duguma Olika, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juma Mhina, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chala Duguma Olika, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Classroom Supervision Operation and Mutual Procedure of Public Elementary School Teachers

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratan Sarkar, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(2) Polycarp Omara, Muni University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratan Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Polycarp Omara, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Humanistic Buddhism and Organizational Behavior: Recommendations of Visions and Mission Statements for Fo Guang Shan and The International Buddha’s Light Association

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna Vajpayee, P P Savani University, India.

(2) Duta Arya Sutrisno.S.Ag, Indonesia.

(3) Gheorghe Gabriel CUCUI, University ”Valahia” of Targoviste, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparna Vajpayee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Duta Arya Sutrisno.S.Ag, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gheorghe Gabriel CUCUI, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Shared Justice Leadership and Digital Access of Teachers in New Normal Education Across Public Elementary Schools

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Harmony Mark-Ewa Eyal, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Bbaale Benjamin, College of Education and External Studies, Makerere University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harmony Mark-Ewa Eyal, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bbaale Benjamin, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Study Habits of Academic Scholars in A Philippine State University, Philippines

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Jonathan O. Etcuban, Cebu Technological University, Philippines.

(2) Muhammad Usman Zahid, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jonathan O. Etcuban, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Usman Zahid, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Automating Financial Decision-Making in Renewable Energy: Leveraging AI and Credit Risk Models for Sustainable Investment

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasanna Pasam, USA.

(2) Chijioke Agupugo, Appalachian State University, United States of America.

(3) Kanaka Rakesh Varma Kothapalli, United States of America.

(4) Gargi Trivedi, Gujarat University, India.

(5) Munnu Prasad V, School of Allied Healthcare and Sciences, Jain (Deemed-to-be University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasanna Pasam, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chijioke Agupugo, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kanaka Rakesh Varma Kothapalli, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gargi Trivedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Munnu Prasad V, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA