Peer Review History: Spatial Analysis of Landslide Susceptibility and Rural Vulnerability in the Gavarud Basin, Western Iran

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Akram Alizadeh, Urmia University, Iran.

(2) Laydong Lepcha, Sikkim State Council of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Khadijat Oyebisi Alabi, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Israa Fadhil Ibraheem, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Muhammad Adam Suni, Indonesia.

(3) Paul Gradenwitz, Wu Yi University Jiangmen, Netherlands.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akram Alizadeh, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Laydong Lepcha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Khadijat Oyebisi Alabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prognostic Supervised Machine Learning Approaches for Upcoming Nigerian Asthma Incidence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso,, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Osowomuabe Njama-Abang, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(2) Jagjot Bhardwaj, United States of America.

(3) Faridul Islam, Northbengal Institute of Development Studies (NIDS), Bangladesh.

(4) Shilpa H.K, Mandya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bazeer Ahamed, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman.

(2) Hitesh Momaya, Ganpat University, India.

(3) Waqar Ul Nisa, Narseemonjee Institute of Management Studies, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osowomuabe Njama-Abang, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagjot Bhardwaj, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Faridul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shilpa H.K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fiscal Restructuring and Economic Growth of Nigeria (1986–2024)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shikha Dharwal, Himachal Pradesh University, India.

(2) Miroljub Hadzic, Singidunum University, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shikha Dharwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miroljub Hadzic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Method for Constructing a Digital Twin Monitoring System for Bridge Cranes Based on Unity3D

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibram Yehia Fawzy Micheal, Minia University, Egypt.

(2) Ava Jahanbiglari, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.

(3) Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology Sultanpur Uttar Pradesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anmol Budhewar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibram Yehia Fawzy Micheal, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ava Jahanbiglari, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pankaj Kumar Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation of Hall Effect on Hydromagnetic Blood Flow in an Inclined Stretching Permeable Vessel of Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Barhm Mohamad, Erbil Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(2) Anoy Chakraborty, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Sutkar, Science College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Barhm Mohamad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anoy Chakraborty, Banglades) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impacts of Solid Wastes on Soil Characteristics of Selected Dump Sites in Okigwe

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Suresh Kumar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi ViswaMahavidyalaya, India.

(2) YidnekachewKifleAweke, Dambi Dollo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Archan Mitra, Amity University Mumbai, India.

(2) Bhagat Singh, SGTB Khalsa College University of Delhi, India.

(3) Ndjouondo Gildas Parfait, The University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

(4) Shunmugasundaram Murugan, SCAD College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(5) Archan Mitra, Amity University Mumbai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Suresh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (YidnekachewKifleAweke, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research on the Path of E-commerce Live Streaming in Promoting Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of China’s Key Counties for Rural Revitalization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Qaisar Abbas Fatimi, New Zealand.

(2) M. Abdul Rahuman, Sadakathullah Appa College ( Autonomous ), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar B R, Xavier Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship, India.

(2) Ankit Srivastava, USA.

(3) Manjit Kaur, S. D. College, Hoshiarpur affiliated to Panjab University, India.

(4) Vo Phuc Thinh, University of Northern Philippines, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qaisar Abbas Fatimi, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Abdul Rahuman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Attitudes of Agricultural Graduates towards Natural Farming in Uttar Pradesh: A Descriptive Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Idris Allinson , Federal Polytechnic Ilaro , Nigeria.

(2) Jitendra Chaurasia, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Duongruitai Nicomrat, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Idris Allinson , Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jitendra Chaurasia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Duongruitai Nicomrat, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Constraints in Groundnut Cultivation in Karimnagar District of Telangana State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Khin Khin Mu, Myanmar.

(2) Mohammed Jiya Mamman, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Raghubar Prasad Singh, Mahatma Gandhi College, India.

(2) Supriya Nedunuri, Dr. YSRHU-College of Horticuture Venkataramannnagudem, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khin Khin Mu, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Jiya Mamman, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation Strategies and Quality Considerations of Spirulina Tablets: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

(2) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatemeh Kazemi Lichaee, Iran.

(2) Saurabh Yashaswee, Munger University, India.

(3) Fidelis Nwachukwu, Roseman University, United States of America.

(4) Juan Sebastian Alvarado, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aman Kumar Tiwari, ICAR-IVRI, Izatnagar, India.

(2) Joan U. Imah-Harry, Precious Cornerstone University, Nigeria.

(2) Sura hameed Nayyef, Tikrit university, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatemeh Kazemi Lichaee, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saurabh Yashaswee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fidelis Nwachukwu, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Juan Sebastian Alvarado, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1(Fatemeh Kazemi Lichaee, Iran) DECLINE | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1(Saurabh Yashaswee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1(Fidelis Nwachukwu, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_4_v1 (Juan Sebastian Alvarado, Argentina) DECLINE | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA