Peer Review History: A Review on Stem Cell Application in Orthopedics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Midhun Krishnan, SK Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bishnu Dev Sharma, Chitwan Medical College, Nepal.

(2) Agung Riyanto Budi Santoso, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bogdan-Alexandru Hagiu, Alexandru Ioan Cuza from Iasi, Romania.

(2) Sagar Madhukar Chavan, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bishnu Dev Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agung Riyanto Budi Santoso, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Progress in RSV Vaccination: Evaluating Developments, Recognizing Opportunities, and Examining Pharmacists’ Functions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kadek Sri Ariyanti, Kartini Bali Health Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) Kabiru Musa, Jigawa State College of Education Gumel, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kadek Sri Ariyanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kabiru Musa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ligaplants in Implantology: A Paradigm Shift in Regenerative Dental Implants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivi Khattri,Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(2) Shurooq Falih Altaie, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pramada Prabhakar, Public Health Dentistry, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivi Khattri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shurooq Falih Altaie, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological overview of leprosy in Brazil: temporal analysis between the years 2013 and 2023

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabuddha Gupta, Amity University Kolkata, India.

(2) Meenakshi Bhattacharya, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Mei Ahyanti, SKM, M.Kes, PoltekkesKemenkes Tanjungkarang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ilea Mihail-Ovidiu, ‘Gr.T.Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Rehan Haider, Riggs Pharmaceutical University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabuddha Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Meenakshi Bhattacharya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mei Ahyanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Divergence and Quantitative Trait Analysis of Yield-related Attributes in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) through Mahalanobis D² Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet ULAŞ, Olive Research Institute, Turkey.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Faridhatun Nikmah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet ULAŞ, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Pesticide Residue Levels in some food crops from markets and farms in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruth Kirinyet, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) ManiruzzamanKhandaker, Jagannath University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) CHUMMUN Vedendranand Sharma, Open University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

(2) V. Ramakrishnan, TANUVAS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruth Kirinyet, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (ManiruzzamanKhandaker, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnobotanical description and anti-Salmonella activity of plants used to treat gastrointestinal infections at Bangourain in the Noun Division, West-Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Elmarie van der Watt, University of the Free State, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) AGNES JOSHY, FRANCIS XAVIER ENGINEERING COLLEGE, INDIA.

(2) Desmond Nkrumah, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(3) T Purushoth Prabhu, The TamilNadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdel Aleem Bello, University of Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic.

(2) Mohsin Salahuddin, University of Haripur, Pakistan.

(3) Pavan Kumar Yanamadala, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (AGNES JOSHY, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Desmond Nkrumah, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T Purushoth Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Broiler Chickens Fed a Diet Supplemented with Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) Powder at Nagaland, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid ChillabKridie Al-Salhie, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Seyoum Bekele Alemu, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

(3) ShakeebUlah, Pakistan.

(4) Kout-ElkloubMoustafa El-Sayed Moustafa, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aisha Saleem, Beijing university of Chemical Technology, China.

(2) Ankit Sharma, School of Veterinary Sciences, Abhilashi University, India.

(3) Marwa A. Suliman, Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(4) Netra P. Osti, National Animal Science Research Institute (NASRI), Nepal.

(5) Priya Patel, Saurashtra University, India.

(6) Raquel Casaes, UFRJ, Brazil.

(6) Ryan c. Fontanilla, Medical Colleges Of Northern Philippines And International School Of Asia And The Pacific , Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid ChillabKridie Al-Salhie, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seyoum Bekele Alemu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (ShakeebUlah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kout-ElkloubMoustafa El-Sayed Moustafa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance evaluation of the helical blade type rotary ridger in soil bin

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahiamadu Jonathan Okirie, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Hussain T. Tahir, Kirkuk University- College of Agriculture, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhiram Reddy Anireddy, United States of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahiamadu Jonathan Okirie, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hussain T. Tahir, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Drug Related Problems in Tertiary Care Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Richard W. SAWADOGO, Institute for Health Science Research (IRSS), Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Virendra Kushwaha, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, India.

(2) D Manjula, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, India.

(3) Abdul Wahid, Quaid I Azam University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanan Elzeblawy Hasssan, Beni-Suef University, Egypt.

(2) TINGUERI L. Bienvenue, Medical Informatics Laboratory (LINFOMED), Burkina Faso.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Virendra Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Manjula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdul Wahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA