Peer Review History: A Multi-Level Encryption Scheme Using Affine Transformations and Non-Singular Recurrence Matrices

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Aziz Arbai, ENSI – Ecole des Nouvelles Sciences & Ingénierie, Morocco.

(2) Karunia Eka Lestari, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia.

(3) M. Seenivasan, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Najm Abdulzahra Makhrib Al-Seraji, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Niran Sabah Jasim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aziz Arbai, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karunia Eka Lestari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Seenivasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The “One Health” Approach for the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections among the Indian Population

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Akmal Nabil Ahmad El-Mazny, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Prakash, AIIMS, Patna, India.

(2) Godfrey Mugisa, Uganda Martyrs University, Uganda.

(3) Pamela Mbuya Otieno, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Antor Odu Ndep, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(2) Munaf Mohsin Naji, University of Kufa, Iraq.

(3) N V Chenchu Lakshmi.K, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foudation, KL College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Nandini Manoli, JSSAHER, India.

(5) Serkan ELARSLAN, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training And Research Hospital, Türkiye.

(6) Sunil Babu Gosipatala, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Godfrey Mugisa, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pamela Mbuya Otieno, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Combining Ability and Genetic Analysis of Grain Yield and its Component Traits in Maize Lines Differing in Turcicum Leaf Blight (TLB) Response

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Satvinder Singh, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Sondarava Praful Mansukhlal, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N Sabitha, ANGRAU, India.

(2) N’DA Hugues Annicet, National Center for Agricultural Research, Côte d’Ivoire.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satvinder Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sondarava Praful Mansukhlal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity of Leptolyngbya sp. Isolated from Paddy Fields

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Zeena Ghazi Faisal, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

(2) Mohanadoss Ponraj, The Copperbelt University, Zambia.

(3) Shama Afroze Baig, Swami Shri Swaroopanand Saraswati Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelgawad Y. Elsadany, Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Buthaina Al Magdamy, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Inampudi Sailaja, SSSC, Swaminarayan University, India.

(4) Seethiya Mahajan, Khalsa University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zeena Ghazi Faisal, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohanadoss Ponraj, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shama Afroze Baig, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis, Spectroscopic Characterization, PXRD Structure and Thermal Study of Bis (Salicylaldiminato) cl2Fe (iii) Complex

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research institute for health sciences Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research institute for health sciences Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

(2) Suprava Nayak, Gangadhar Meher University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jhakeshwar Prasad, Shri Shankaracharya College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zlatko Lozanovski, Republic of North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suprava Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genoprotective Efficacy of Momordica dioica vs. Momordica charantia: Evidence for the Assessment of DNA Protective Potential in Momordica Species

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Makhabbah Jamilatun, Health Polytechnic of Health Ministry Surakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Stephen Williams Ngbo, Federal University Wukari , Nigeria.

(3) Parinita Tripathy , Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arti Ghabru, College of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(2) Naziya Ashpak Tamboli, DABTU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Makhabbah Jamilatun, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stephen Williams Ngbo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Parinita Tripathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Genetic Diversity, Correlation and Variability of the Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) Genotype

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Heena Kouser H M, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

(2) Asit Prasad Dash, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nyadoi Priscilla, Uganda Maryrs University, Uganda.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Heena Kouser H M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asit Prasad Dash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Decoherence Impediments in Quantum Computing and Fundamental Challenges of Quantum Error Correction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. G. Sudheer, GVP College of Engineering for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh Ramaswamy, Northeastern University, United States.

(2) Narasimha Rao Boinapalli, USA.

(3) Augustine Chidiebere Onuora, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic Unwana – Ebonyi state, Nigeria.

(4) Rakesh Kumar ER, SAMS College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(2) Avik Ghosh, USA.

(3) Chitra Ganesh Desai, National Defence Academy, India.

(4) P. Thamilselvan, KLEF (Deemed to be University), India.

(5) Subba Reddy Borra, Dr K V Subba Reddy Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogesh Ramaswamy, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narasimha Rao Boinapalli, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Augustine Chidiebere Onuora, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rakesh Kumar ER, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of different levels and sources of P on grain quality and crop productivity of pearl millet in semi–arid region of Northwest India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Frederico Denardi, Brazil.

(2) Zbiri Asmae, University Mohammed, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sangita Basrani, Govt Tilak PG College, India.

(2) Usman Kedir, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Frederico Denardi, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zbiri Asmae, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sub-Chronic Hepatotoxicity of Aluminium Phosphide in Wistar Rats: Biochemical and Histopathological Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Viktar Lemiasheuski, Belarusian State University, Republic of Belarus.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamlesh Kumar Bhatt, Modern Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Sarmishtha Chatterjee, India.

(3) Seda Simsek, Selcuk University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adeep Kujur, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, India.

(2) J.Poongothai, PSG College of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamlesh Kumar Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarmishtha Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seda Simsek, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA