Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Conservation and Assisted Restoration of IUCN-Listed Tree Species: A Review from the Western Ghats

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Teresa Lopez-Lara, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Swati Gupta, Vivekananda Global University, India.

(2) KHAOUANI Boumediene, ALGERIA.

(3) Rekha Mahato, ICFRE-Rain Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) IGYUVE Moses Terngum, Federal University of Agriculture, Mubi, Nigeria.

(2) Jonnala Subba Reddy, Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering, India.

(3) Oleh Hnatiuk, Ukrainian Mountain Forestry Research Institute named after P.S. Pasternak, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swati Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (KHAOUANI Boumediene, ALGERIA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rekha Mahato, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and Pinching on Plant Growth and Flowering Parameters in Calendula

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghassen Abid, Tunisia.

(2) Ashish Jaiswal, ISBM University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Yahia Ibrahim Thabet, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Umul  Aiman, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta (UMBY), Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghassen Abid, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Quality and Physiological Responses of Lai Saak (Brassica juncea var. integrifolia) to Nutrient Management

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar, K R Mangalam University, India.

(2) N.K. Kushwaha, India.

(3) Pradeep Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kannan CS Warrier, KSCSTE-Kerala Forest Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N.K. Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pradeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Analysing the Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and Associated Factors among Final-Year Students at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Katayoun Haryalchi, Guilan University of Medical Science, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Narendra Namdev, Shree Krishna University, India.

(2) Lakshmi Singh, Naraina Medical College, India.

(3) Bondarieva Iryna, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narendra Namdev, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Singh,India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bondarieva Iryna, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Yield and Quality Attributes in Non-Basmati Rice Lines: Implications for Breeding

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jalpesh Patel, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

(2) Elizabeth León García, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bineetkaur Sukhminder Singh, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Sopialena, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jalpesh Patel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elizabeth León García, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Post Harvest Management of Bulbous Ornamentals

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Maleeha Alam, The University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(2) Parikha Prakash Singh, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(3) Ali Rıza Demirkıran, Bingol University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maleeha Alam, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parikha Prakash Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Rıza Demirkıran, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Toxicopathology of Indoxacarb and Its Amelioration with Vitamin C in Wistar Rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrijanto Hauferson Angi, State Agricultural Polytechnic of Kupang, Indonesia.

(2) Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad., Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. S Prasanna, KVASU, India.

(2) M. Gurulakshmi, New Prince Shri Bhavani College Of Engineering And Technology, India.

(3) Mostafa Mourad Mohammed, Minia University, Egypt.

(4) Nayeli Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico.

(5) Satya Dinesh Madasu, Bapatla Engineering College, India.

(6) Zainab Azaz, University Of The Punjab, Pakistan.

(7) Anita Restu Puji Raharjeng, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andrijanto Hauferson Angi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lamis Mohamed Nader Saad., Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Metagenomics: An Emerging Novel Approach to Assess Microbial Diversity in the Riverine Ecosystem

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manju Hajarilal Pardeshi, Arts Commerce and Science College Maregaon, India.

(2) S.Balamurugan, Bharathidasan University, India.

(3) Ahmad Aftas Bin Azman, Politeknik Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A Rose Venis, St. Joseph’s College(Autonomous), India.

(2) B.Usharani, VISTAS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manju Hajarilal Pardeshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmad Aftas Bin Azman, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Eco-Friendly Adsorption of Adenine on MMT: A Green Chemistry Approach to Prebiotic Surface Processes

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research institute for health sciences, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Ozanildo Vilaca Do Nascimento, Federal University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(2) Deniz Cenikli, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

(3) M.V. Sureshkumar, Jansons Institute of Technology, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sihem LARBI, University of Sciences and Technology of Oran Mohammed Boudiaf, Algeria.

(2) Olawale Bamidele, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(3) Mohammed Jaafar Ali Alatabe, Iraq.

(4) Hemaprobha Saikia, Bodoland University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ozanildo Vilaca Do Nascimento, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deniz Cenikli, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.V. Sureshkumar, INDIA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA