Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Ilavarasan, ICAR- Indian veterinary Research Institute, India.

(2) Nnachor, Amarachi Clare, Missouri University of Science and Technology, United State of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Daniel Chinedu Nweze, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Ilavarasan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nnachor, Amarachi Clare, United State of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Zubeyir Cebeci, Ordu University Medical School, Turkiye.

(2) Amenu Wirtu, Meritus School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

(3) Jagadish Hansa, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zubeyir Cebeci, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amenu Wirtu, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jagadish Hansa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Salem Aboglila, Azzaytuna University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kumar, Maharishi Markandeshwar (DU), India.

(2) Telly Yarita Macias Zambrano, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manjula, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Telly Yarita Macias Zambrano, Ecuador) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra,  University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Tri Indrarini Wirjantoro, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

(2) R.Mangalanayaki, Sengamala Thayaar Educational Trust Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Costea Dorin Constantin, University of Craiova, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tri Indrarini Wirjantoro, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R.Mangalanayaki, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Lalengkima, Mizoram University, India.

(2) Helfer Cusilayme-Barrantes, National Amazonian University of Madre de Dios, Peru.

(3) Harshit Pant, G.B.Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment (NIHE), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lalengkima, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Helfer Cusilayme-Barrantes, Peru) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Harshit Pant, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Lalit Kumar Rolaniya, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akarsh s v, Acharya n g ranga agricultural university, India.

(2) Joel Osei-Asiamah, University Of South Africa, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lalit Kumar Rolaniya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan,  Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Alina Boistean, Technical University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova.

(2)Samuel A. Akande, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute (NSPRI), Nigeria.

(3) Inkorena G. S. Sukartono, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Barman, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

(2) Auwalu Sammani, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(3) Deshpande H.W., VNMKV, India.

(4) Divyashree M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(5) Inkorena G. S. Sukartono, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia.

(6) Mohamed Gadallah Elsayed Gadallah, College of Agriculture and Food, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(7) Shahzeb Javed, University of Salerno, Italy.

(8) Syed Sumera Ali, Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alina Boistean, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel A. Akande, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Inkorena G. S. Sukartono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Khalil, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Bangladesh.

(2) Manoj Arun Gud, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Khalil, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Arun Gud, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Debasmita Sarkar Dhar, Adamas University, India.

(2) Nivedita Mishra Thapliyal, Uttaranchal University, India.

(3) Kamakula N Murthy, VFSTR- Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research (Deemed to be University, India.

(4) A. Anandalakshmy, Dr N G P Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dilip Kumar Bhuyan, Kherajkhat College, India.

(2) Ipsita Chakraborty, South Calcutta Girls’ College, Indian.

(3) Meena Suguanthi.G, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debasmita Sarkar Dhar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nivedita Mishra Thapliyal India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamakula N Murthy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (A. Anandalakshmy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinicius Teixeira do Nascimento, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Brazil.

(2) Sumana Balo, FAS, SOA Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ardeshir Kalali, Iran.

(2) K.Kalaiarasi, Bharathidasan University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinicius Teixeira do Nascimento, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sumana Balo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA