Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Gana Pati Ojha, Agricultural and Forestry University, Nepal.

(2) Arunima Nandy, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Navneet Maurya, Sardar Patel University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gana Pati Ojha, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arunima Nandy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Salem Aboglila, Libyan Academy for Postgraduate Studies, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Mushtaque Ahmed Rahu, Pakistan.

(2) Elangovan Guruva Reddy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mushtaque Ahmed Rahu, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elangovan Guruva Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chien-Jen Wang, National University of Tainan, Tainan.

(2) Prof. Giovanni Bucci, University of L’Aquila (Italy).

(3) Prof. Grzegorz Golanski,Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Maksym Bolotov, Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

(2) Madyan Ahmed Khalaf, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(3) Kalyani Mohanty, UPC Barcelona, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maksym Bolotov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madyan Ahmed Khalaf, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kalyani Mohanty, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) P S V Padma Latha, Ramachandra College of Engineering(A), India

(2) Vinay Saxena, Kisan Post Graduate College, India

(3) Akinbusola Olushola, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States

(4) George Albert Toma, Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Syrian Arab Republic

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P S V Padma Latha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akinbusola Olushola, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (George Albert Toma, Syrian Arab Republic) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Marzuki, Fajar University, Indonesia.

(2) Usman Muhammad Tukur, Central South University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ismail Marzuki, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Usman Muhammad Tukur, China) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahra Ba-Aqqa, Higher Institute of Nursing and Health Professions, Morocco.

(2) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University, Iraq.

(3) Halidu Imurana, Lucknow University, India.

(4) Marina G D’Souza, Sandip Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Usman Aslam, UCMD Uol Pakistan, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahra Ba-Aqqa, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Halidu Imurana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Marina G D’Souza, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Win Myint Oo, Aimst University, Malaysia.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhavalkumar Gohel, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, USA.

(2) Lofor Patrick FMCpath, University of Benin, Nigeria.

(3) Uttejna Tewari, Shija Academy of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maurice Silali, Mount Kigali University, Rwanda.

(2) M.Meenakumari, S. A. College of Arts & Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhavalkumar Gohel, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lofor Patrick FMCpath, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Uttejna Tewari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamid El Bilali, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM-Bari), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

(2) Ghana Kanta Sarma, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghana Kanta Sarma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Purnendu Basu, The ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, India.

(2) Maharshi Rahevar, Shree Swaminarayan Arts and Commerce College, India.

(3) Lokesh V Tardalkar, University of Mumbai, India.

(4) Era Lamba, CCS HAU, India.

(5) Wilhelmina Jerome Lyimo, St. Augustine University of Tanzania, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anju Kapoor, College of Community Science, CSKHPKV, Palampur (H.P.), India.

(2) Iyanda Kamoru Ahmed, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

(3) Joshua Wafula Chesoli, Kisii University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Purnendu Basu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maharshi Rahevar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lokesh V Tardalkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Era Lamba, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Wilhelmina Jerome Lyimo, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)Concordia, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Manikandan, Shrimati Indira Gandhi College, India.

(2) Saima Riaz, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture Multan, Pakistan.

(3) Mahesh Kumar N, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Manikandan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saima Riaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahesh Kumar N, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA