Peer Review History: Effect of foliar nutrition on growth parameters of bhindi [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Suphathida Aumtong, Maejo University, Thailand.

(2) Adelina Siregar, Pattimura University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nishtha Seth, Bareilly College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suphathida Aumtong, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adelina Siregar, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Wunderlich Syndrome Complicated by Page Kidney as the Initial Presentation of Polyarteritis Nodosa: A rare case report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Lubna Azmi, University of Lucknow, India.

(2) Jean Filipov, Alexandrovska Hospital, Bulgaria.

(3) S. P. Tejaswi Pullakanam, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agamdeep Singh Bedi, India.

(2) Nimra Nazir, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Paranthaman Ramamoorthy, Vignan’s foundation for science, technolofgy and research, India.

(4) Prem Singh Nayyer, Dr Bsa Medical College And Hospital, India.

(5) Raghavaram Namburu, Dr. N.T.R. University Of HealthSciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lubna Azmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jean Filipov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. P. Tejaswi Pullakanam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Internal Efficiency of Catholic State-Approved Primary Schools in Goma

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Jonah O. Gonzalo, National Aviation Academy of The Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Indah Sari, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aloke Verma, Kalinga University, India.

(2) Ngwu, Martina Nnenna, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Zuraihah Binti Ngadengon, Politeknik Muadzam Shah, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jonah O. Gonzalo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indah Sari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adhocracy Culture and Organizational Adaptability: Insights into Strategic Plan Implementation in Kenya’s Insurance Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Rabel B. Catayoc, Mindanao State University – Iligan Institution of Technology, Philippines.

(2) Adewale Abass Adekunle, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria.

(3) Valentyna Yasyshena, Vinnytsia Education and Research Institute of Economy of West Ukrainian National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rabel B. Catayoc, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adewale Abass Adekunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Valentyna Yasyshena, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Fields to Futures: The Economic and Occupational Impact of the Rice Tariffication Law

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Jagadish Tulimelli, Vignan Deemed to be University, India.

(2) DSc Zdzislaw W. Puslecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(3) H.Chandrashekar, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lakshman Kumareshan, JAIN(Deemed-to-be)University, India.

(2) Ronak Modi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagadish Tulimelli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (DSc Zdzislaw W. Puslecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (H.Chandrashekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of NPK and Urea Briquette Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Apahidean Alexandru, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Theeranat Suwanaruang, Kalasin University, Thailand.

(3) Arun Kumar Rath, Sri Jayadev College of Education and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Apahidean Alexandru, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theeranat Suwanaruang, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arun Kumar Rath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Meteorological Analysis of Extreme Fires in Albania during the Period 2019–2025

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) N. Anusha, Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology (Autonomous), India.

(2) Vandita Srivastava, India.

(3) Antonio Pereira Júnior, Pará State University, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. Anusha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vandita Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Antonio Pereira Júnior, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modeling of a Hybrid System for Current and Future Energy Sustainability with Improved Economic Developments Using Present Grid Network Topology

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan AYDOGAN, Selcuk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Omprakash Sahu, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) S. Pushpa, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Darlington Eze Ekechukwu, University Of East London, United Kingdom.

(2) I Made Aditya Nugraha, Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Kupang, Indonesia.

(3) L.Raja Mohan Reddy, Government Degree College, India.

(4) Sara Fennane, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omprakash Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Pushpa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Corporate Governance and Financial Risk Management in Ghana’s Pension Industry: A Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Schemes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(2) Dr. Choi Sang Long, Raffles University Iskandar, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Latif, Pakistan.

(2) Olajide Solomon FADUN, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ramesh Inala, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Latif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olajide Solomon FADUN, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Systematic Literature Review on the Internationalization Development Path of Fuliang Tea E-commerce under the Rural Revitalization Strategy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Lavinia Mastac, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania.

(2) Mariia Plotnikova, Polissia National University, Ukraine.

(3) Kavita Dahiya, Manipal Jaipur University, India.

(4) S. Saranya, Alagappa University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Josep Pastrana-Huguet, Consell Insular de Menorca. National University of Distance Education, Spain.

(2) Namrata Kishnani, The Bhopal School of Social Sciences, India.

(3) S.Saranya, Alagappa University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lavinia Mastac, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mariia Plotnikova, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kavita Dahiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (S. Saranya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA