Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy

Reviewers:

(1) Puia Dragos, University for Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T Popa, Romania.

(2) Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puia Dragos, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nelmie P. Ponio, J. H. Cerilles State College, Philippines.

(2) Mutari Abubakari, CSIR-SARI, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nelmie P. Ponio, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mutari Abubakari, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Thomas F. George, University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Argha Modak, The University of Burdwan, India.

(2) Suchitra Panigrahy, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Argha Modak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suchitra Panigrahy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Santosh Kumar Nathsharma, Stewart Science College, India.

(2) Dhara D. Patel, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

(3) Mohammad M Al-Tufah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Santosh Kumar Nathsharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhara D. Patel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad M Al-Tufah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alejandro Melo-Florián, Internal Medicine Specialist – Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia.

(2) Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja, Chakrasiddha Holistic Healing and Research Centre, India.

(3) Mithun Bhowmick, Bengal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alejandro Melo-Florián, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhuvanagiri Sathya Sindhuja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mithun Bhowmick, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Puja Singh, Bundelkhand Medical College, India.

(2) Gabriel Ogunma Benjamin, University of Benin, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puja Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gabriel Ogunma Benjamin, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Julio Cesar MARIN LEAL, Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela.

(2) Dulal Kumar De, Midnapore College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julio Cesar MARIN LEAL, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dulal Kumar De, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria.

(2) Sulem Yong Nina Nindum, Institute of Agricultural Research For Development (IRAD), Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sulem Yong Nina Nindum, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Peter Isaiah Akpan, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(2) Nubia Nieto, Autonomous University of Guerrero, United Kingdom.

(3) J.B. Ehimony, University of South Africa, South Africa.

(4) Aneesh Joseph, IGNOU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peter Isaiah Akpan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nubia Nieto, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (J.B. Ehimony, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Aneesh Joseph, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) M Bambang Purwanto, Indonesia.

(2) Natalya Chernova, Kazan Federal University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Bambang Purwanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Natalya Chernova, Russia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA