Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Variation of Protein Content and Mellisopalynogical Status in the Raw and Branded Honey Samples in Chalisgaon Region, North Maharashtra, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa, Institute of Water Modelling, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Dwarka, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Ana Balea, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dwarka, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ana Balea, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Exploration of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Potential of Agro-industrial and Spent Waste of Camellia Sinensis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Panth, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar College, India.

(2) Vijay Nigam, Daksh Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, India.

(3) Felicia Andrei, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Panth, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijay Nigam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Felicia Andrei, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Metabolic Therapy for Lipedema: Can Tirzepatide Overcome the Treatment Gap?

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Veterinary University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jana Jamail, King’s College London, United States of America.

(2) Manfred Doepp, Switzerland.

(3) Thualfiqar Ghalib Turki, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jana Jamail, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manfred Doepp, Switzerland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thualfiqar Ghalib Turki, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Morphometric Characterization of Sudda Vagu Basin in a Hard rock Aquifer System Using Geospatial and Geostatistical Tools in Part of Nirmal District, Telangana State, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dev Sen Gupta, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Bharat L Gadakh, K.R.T.Arts, B.H.Commerce and A.M.Science(KTHM) College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dev Sen Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bharat L Gadakh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Diverse Roles of Trichoderma spp. for Sustainable Agriculture

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaik Munnysha, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Durga Prasad Awasthi, College of Agriculture, Tripura, KVK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaik Munnysha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Durga Prasad Awasthi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: An In-vitro Dissolution Profile and Impurity Analysis Comparing Commercially Available Dutasteride Tamsulosin Fixed Drug Combinations

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic Belgrade, Serbia.

(2) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Atul Pratap Singh, IIMT University Meerut, India.

(2) Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom.

(3) Shahab Masoumi, Vanderbilt University, US.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atul Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shahab Masoumi, US) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Statistical Synthesis of Heckman-Based Selection with Conway-Maxwell-Poisson Probability Models

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramakrishna Kolikipogu, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology (Osmania University), India.

(2) Amilcar Marcelo Varela Enríquez, Institute of Higher National Studies – The State Postgraduate University of Ecuador, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Melika Ashoori, International Energy Studies, Iran.

(2) Mohammed Rasheed, University of Technology, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramakrishna Kolikipogu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amilcar Marcelo Varela Enríquez, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Molecular Characterisation of Enteric Bacteria in Diarrhoeic Stool Samples of Children Less than Five Years in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Hemangi D. Mehta, Children’s Research University, India.

(2) Shola Lawrence Owolabi, Gateway Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hemangi D. Mehta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shola Lawrence Owolabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Toward Certification of Wing-Structure- Integrated Hydrogen Tanks: A Cross-Industry Review of Relevant Standards

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

(2) Dr. Felipe Silva Semaan, Federal University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Chintan Morsiya, L. J. Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Miodrag, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chintan Morsiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Miodrag, Serbia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA