Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Zambare, India.

(2) Ajay Kumar, Chandigarh College of Hospitality, CGC Landran, India.

(3) El Mejhed Badreddine, University of Sultan Moulay Slimane, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Zambare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mejhed Badreddine, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanmi Odeyemi, University of North Dakota, USA.

(2) Durdarshi JUGGOO, Mauritiius.

(3) Marcelo Antonio Nero, Federal University of Minas Gerais – Brazil, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanmi Odeyemi, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Durdarshi JUGGOO, Mauritiius) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marcelo Antonio Nero, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Patrizia Diana, University of Palermo, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Parul Sharma, Oklahoma State University, USA.

(2) Alhassan Fathy, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parul Sharma, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alhassan Fathy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Pushparaj S, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, India.

(3) Aditya Kumar Singh, CAU-I, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pushparaj S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aditya Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Vijayalakshmi, Queen Marys College, University of Madras.

(2) Samborlang K. Wanniang, College of Agriculture Kyrdemkulai Meghalaya, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samborlang K. Wanniang, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ambati Padmaja, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, India.

(2) Patricia Ese Umoru, Nigerian Defence Academy Kaduna, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ambati Padmaja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Patricia Ese Umoru, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Satyadhar Joshi, USA.

(2) D.William Albert, Jawaharlal Technological University, India.

(3) Anas Ibrahim, Adeyemi College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satyadhar Joshi, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D.William Albert, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anas Ibrahim, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

(2) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Haryax Pathak, Shree Krishna Hospital and Pramukh Swami Medical College, India.

(2) Nabeelah Ismail, Thumbay University Hospital, UAE.

(3) Vinita Sarbhai, Kasturba Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haryax Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabeelah Ismail, UAE) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vinita Sarbhai, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Budhi Ida Bagus, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta,Indonesian.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayli Heydari, Turkey.

(2) Sathishkumar Jayagadhi, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayli Heydari, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sathishkumar Jayagadhi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dany Joy, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Mykola Yaremenko, NTUU KPI, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dany Joy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mykola Yaremenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA