Peer Review History: Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Neglected Tropical Diseases in Nigeria Using Data from Dimensions Database

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University College, Iraq.

(2) Nguyen Tat Thanh, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Vietnam.

(3) Lawrence Chimbwali, University Of Zambia, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nguyen Tat Thanh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lawrence Chimbwali, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advancing Groundwater Remediation: Efficacy of Slow-release Permanganate Gels (SRPG) in Treating Contaminant Plumes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Fawzy Yousef, Desert Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Amarsinh B. Landage, L.S.P. Government College of Engineering, India.

(2) Risalah A. Mohammed, Southern Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Rajesh Kumar, Ranchi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amarsinh B. Landage, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Risalah A. Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Membrane Fouling Dynamics in the Clarification of Pineapple Juice after Egg Albumin Pretreatment: A Study on Hermia’s Empirical Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tatjana Radosavljević, Institute of Pathophysiology, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Washington Mutatu, Zimbabwe Sugarcane Research Institute, Zimbabwe.

(2) Vijay Singh, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(3) Ranjit Singh, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Washington Mutatu, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijay Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ranjit Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Maximizing the Benefit of Papaya Fruits (Carica papaya) in Production of Some Bakery Products

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

(2) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Srilatha Pathiam, Professor Jayshankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ukoro Frank O., Akperan Orshi Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srilatha Pathiam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ukoro Frank O., Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on Analysis of Correlation Coefficient and Path Coefficient for Certain Quantitative Traits in Fieldpea (Pisum sativum L. var. arvense)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant Professor, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shehrooz Afzal, Institute of Botany, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Nidal Shaban, University of Forestry, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shehrooz Afzal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nidal Shaban, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Physico-chemical Parameters of Selected Clotrimazole Pessaries from Pharmaceutical Importers and Accredited Drug Dispensing Outlets in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Cosmin Moldovan, University Titu Maiorescu of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Mohammad Anas Alfeen, Al-Ayen Iraqi University, Syria.

(3) Sabira Sultana, GCUF, Pakistan.

(4) Himaja Trivedi Mamidibathula, Acharya Nagarjuna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cosmin Moldovan, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Anas Alfeen, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sabira Sultana, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Himaja Trivedi Mamidibathula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biotic and Abiotic Factors as Variables in Population Build-up of Mustard Aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt.) in the Western Gangetic Planes of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nitin Mishra, Assistant Professor, Graphic Era University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheetal Anand, University of Lucknow, India.

(2) Joyjit Ghosh, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekanada Centenery College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheetal Anand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joyjit Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Affecting Factors NO2 Distribution between 2019-2021 in the East Java, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. LUO Ching-Ruey (Edward), Associate Professor, National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Wali Mohammad Waseq, Parwan university, Afghanistan.

(2) Eman A. Muhsin, Iraq.

(3) Md. Towhidul Islam, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wali Mohammad Waseq, Afghanistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eman A. Muhsin, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Towhidul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Evaluation of Complimentary Food Produced from Malted Rice (Oryza sativa), Tiger Nut (Cyperus esculentus) and defatted Sesame Seeds (Sesamum indicum) Flour Blends Using Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Associate Professor, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Devender Sharma, RJ World College of Pharmacy Education and Technology, India.

(2) Talabi Olaoluwa Temitope, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devender Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talabi Olaoluwa Temitope, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessing Early Public Health Intervention in Wuhan, China

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Najmeen Nisha, ERA’s Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, College in Lucknow, India.

(2) Jamshid Ullah, IQRA National University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Najmeen Nisha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jamshid Ullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA