Peer Review History: Two-Sample Calibrated Imputation in Surveys: A Methodological Framework for Secondary Data Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavani Sankar Panda, India.

(2) Nagham Ajeel Sultan, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Nynalasetti Kondala Kameswara Rao, Sagi Rama Krishnam Raju Engineering College, India.

(4) Menakshi Pachori, Ambedkar University,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelnaser Omran , Libya.

(2) Jesse nyokabi, Kenya.

(3) Ruqaya Shaker Mahmood, University of Technology, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhavani Sankar Panda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagham Ajeel Sultan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nynalasetti Kondala Kameswara Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Menakshi Pachori, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Augmented osteosynthesis in fractures of the distal end of the femur in elderly patients: surgical technique, anatomical and functional results

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Triki Mohamed Amine, Sahloul University Hospital, Tunisia.

Reviewers:

(1) Bheemsingh Samorekar, K.H.Patil Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Maksim Kovacevic, University of East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(3) Naila Abdul Sattar, Government College Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Francis Zifa Pentece Zengui, Marien NGOUABI University, Republic Of Congo.

(2) M. Anita Indu, Shri Shankarlal Sundarbai Shasun Jain College for Women, India.

(3) Nirmal Kumar Sinha, Manipal University College Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bheemsingh Samorekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maksim Kovacevic, Bosnia and Herzegovina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Naila Abdul Sattar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Antioxidant Contents and Structural Identification by HPTLC and HPLC-MS/MS of Carotenoids in the BF59XCIP1 Variety of Ipomoea batatas L.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung Cheal Moon, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Vijaya Lakshmi Marella, KVSR Siddhartha College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Ayad Kadhim Fadhil, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Beril Anılanmert, Istanbul University Institute of Forensic Sciences, Turkey.

(2) Bhagyalata Satapathy, India.

(3) Devi Thamizhanban, Annamalai University, India.

(4) Sarif Niroush Konari, JDT Islam College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Suyash Sawale, University of Mumbai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vijaya Lakshmi Marella, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayad Kadhim Fadhil, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reproductive Performance and Profitability of Local and Imported Clarias gariepinus Strains in Two Agro-ecological Zones of Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Giri, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(2) Saheed Kolawole, Turkiye.

(3) Tena Alemu Yindo, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alfatlawi Monyer Abdulameir Abed, Al-Qadisiyah University, Iraq.

(2) Nisrinah, Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia.

(3) R S Prasad, India.

(4) Shailendar Mogdumpuram, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saheed Kolawole, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tena Alemu Yindo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of the Kombucha Genitri (Elaeocarpus ganitrus) E-Module to Improve Students Understanding of Fermentation Concepts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Aderemi Moses Adewale, Nigeria.

(2) Nikolaos Psyrras, Greece.

(3) Kwan Siew Wai, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aderemi Moses Adewale, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nikolaos Psyrras, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kwan Siew Wai, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: E-Learning in Higher Education during COVID-19: Experiences, Challenges and Lessons from Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdullahi Ismaila Abubakar, Sokoto State University, Nigeria.

(2) K. Karthikeyan, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pallavi D R, University College- Mangalore University, India.

(2) Deepti Jain, Rani Durgawati University, India.

(3) Harold R. Lucero, Colegio de Sta. Teresa de Avila, Philippines.

(4) Nagapavan Chintalapatim, Central University of Jharkhand, India.

(5) Somaya Zine-Dine, Ibnou Toufail University, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdullahi Ismaila Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Karthikeyan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategic Drivers of Supermarket Sustainability: Evidence from Nairobi County

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Adina Dornean, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Niranchana Shri Viswanathan, Sapthagiri NPS University, India.

(2) Rishad Kabir, Begum Rokeya University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jamsedul Islam, Noakhali Science & Technology University (NSTU), Bangladesh.

(2) M. Kemal Unsacar, Turkey.

(3) S, Rukmani Devi, Saveetha College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, SIMATS Deemed to be University, India.

(4) T. Aditya Sai Srinivas, Ravindra College of Engineering for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niranchana Shri Viswanathan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rishad Kabir, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of the Radiopacity of Zinc Oxide-eugenol Cements using Different Radiographic Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

(2) Sivakumar Manickam ,Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Tungku Highway, Brunei.

Reviewers:

(1) Geetha T, Sathyabama Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Suraj Malpani, MUHS, India.

(3) S.Amuthan, Sri Venkateshwaraa Dental College,  India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rayappa Shrinivas Mahale, School of Mechanical Engineering, REVA University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Geetha T, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suraj Malpani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Amuthan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The role of Machine Learning (ML) in predicting consumer behaviour: innovation or violation?

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Maharshi Rahevar, Shree Swaminarayan Arts and Commerce College, HNGU, India.

(2) Shivam Tripathi, Lakulish Yoga University, India.

(3) Bindoo Malviya, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geeta Sharma, Jagan Institute of Management Studies(Affiliated to IP university), India.

(2) K.Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

(3) Ravi Rachapudi, Dr.K.V.Subba Reddy school of Business Management, JNTUA, India.

(4) Surjadeep Dutta, Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College, India.

(5) Vibhuti Shivam Dube, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maharshi Rahevar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivam Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bindoo Malviya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Non-tree Carbon Pools and Tree Trait Effects in Polavaram Range, Andhra Pradesh” or “Litter, Herbaceous and Soil Carbon in Polavaram Range (Andhra Pradesh, India): Influence of Tree Height, DBH and Density

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratan Lal Solanki, KVK, India.

(2) Kyawt Yin Min Thein, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Immy Suci Rohyani, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

(2) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

(3) Peter Isaiah Akpan, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(4) Ratan Lal Solank, KVK, Chittorgarh, MPUAT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratan Lal Solanki, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kyawt Yin Min Thein, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA