Peer Review History: Modelling Fluid Flow in an Open Circular Channel with Three Lateral Inflows

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohit Yadav, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Barhm Mohamad, Iraq.

(3) Ashish Garg, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Kanni Raj, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology (deemed to be University, recognised as Category-I institute by Government of India), India.

(2) Ahmed S. Habeeb, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(3) Alfunsa Prathiba, CVR College of Engineering, India.

(4) Gunawan Nugroho, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember , Indonesia.

(5) Madan Lal, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand Rohilkhand University, India.

(6) Niculescu Mihai Leonida, INCAS – National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli”, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohit Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Barhm Mohamad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashish Garg, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Probiotic Potential of Mulberry (Morus spp.) Fruit Juice: A Comprehensive Review and Functional Beverage Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) R A Ram, India.

(2) Ayowole Victor Ater, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jassim Edan Qasim Almusawi, University of Baghdad , Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R A Ram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayowole Victor Ater, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Mutation Point and Trend in Export of Indian Groundnut

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gopal Krishan, National Institute of Hydrology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinay Kumar, India.

(2) Yagbasuah Maada Baion, Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agboola, Lydia Ololade, Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN), Nigeria.

(2) Ehsanur Rauf Prince, East West University, Bangladesh.

(3) Ihekoromadu Chisomaga Happiness, University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(4) P.Pushpa, St. Peter’s Institute of higher Education and Research, India.

(5) R. Nidhishree, Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture, TNAU, India.

(6) André Pedral Sampaio de Sena, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brasil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yagbasuah Maada Baion, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn) resistance in rice cultivars in Madhya Pradesh

Editor(s): 

(1) Dr.  Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh,Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Arpitha H B, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Md. Mahtab Rashid, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Satyendra, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammod Hossain, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arpitha H B, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Mahtab Rashid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Satyendra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Mango Storage Time and Pasteurization on the Physicochemical Parameters of Mango Puree Produced in the Northern Part of Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunying Li, Georgia State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ngaha Damndja Wilfred, Cameroon.

(2) Bomminayuni Gowtham Prasad, India.

(3) Setyadjit, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) El Mejhed Badreddine , University of Sultan Moulay Slimane, Morocco.

(2) Shubham Patel, Acharya Narendra Deve University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ngaha Damndja Wilfred, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bomminayuni Gowtham Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Setyadjit, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (No res) | NA | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prioritisation of Promising Therapeutic Targets in Plasmodium falciparum Using in Silico Multi Criteria Scoring

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Indunil Karunarathna, Teaching Hospital Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka.

(2) Mkhayar Khaoula, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah-Fez University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:.

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Indunil Karunarathna, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mkhayar Khaoula, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compactness of pseudo-differential type operators involving fractional Fourier transform

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen,   The University of Iowa,  Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mykola Yaremenko, National Technical University of Ukraine, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine.

(2) V. Kumar, Ghent University, Belgium.

(3) Ahmed Buseri Ashine, Arsi University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mykola Yaremenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Kumar, Belgium) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmed Buseri Ashine, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic and Technological Impacts of UAS-Bengaluru Crop Varieties on Karnataka Agriculture, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Debashis Mandal, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aman Tutlani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (SKUAST–K), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debashis Mandal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of Ocimum basilicum and Ocimum gratissimum Essential Oils and Their Emulsions against Selected Trichophyton species

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khadiga Mohamed Abu-Zied, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fabio Altieri, Sapienza University,  Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kaveri G.S., Shri Dharmasthala Manjunateeshwara University , India.

(2) Essoh Ayimba, Togo.

(3) Alex Sander Lopes da Silva, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kaveri G.S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Essoh Ayimba, Togo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alex Sander Lopes da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Amylases Production from Fonio Using Central Composite Design

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Viktar Lemiasheuski, Belarusian State University, Republic of Belarus.

Reviewers:

(1) Ikechukwu Iloh Udema, Nigeria.

(2) Samuel Kwatia, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Udema Iloh Ikechukwu, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ikechukwu Iloh Udema, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Kwatia, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA