Peer Review History: Comparative Performance of Amaranth, Amaranthus spp. Grown by Using Stored Water from Different Lined Farm Ponds

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Suraj Kalgonda Patil, DKTEs Textile & Engineering Institute, India.

(2) Cantir Angela, Moldova State University, Republic of Moldova.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Veronica Mwikali Kiluva, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suraj Kalgonda Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cantir Angela, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study the Economic Analysis of Amaranthus for Different Lining Materials of Farm Ponds in Konkan Region, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa A. J. Al-sammarraie, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Neelam Kadian, NABARD Consultancy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafa A. J. Al-sammarraie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neelam Kadian, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: GIS and AHP Based Flood Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Chalakudy River Basin, Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

(2) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gautam Gupta, India.

(2) Elham Motaharfard, University of Ilam, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Senthilkumar Meyyappan, Nalla Malla Reddy Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gautam Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elham Motaharfard, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of PBAT-Starch Nanoclay Composite Films for Quality Retention of Toast during Storage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) N. R. Sardar, College of Food Processing Technology and Bioenergy Anand Agricultural University, India.

(2) Pramod Singh, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hadeel Obedat, Jerash University, Jordan.

(2) Masoumeh Hosseinzadeh, Azad  Aslamic University of Qaemshahr, Iran.

(3) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

(4) Morris Terfa Aloysius, Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N. R. Sardar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pramod Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Cadmium Toxicity in Freshwater Fish: Physiological, Ecological and Health Implications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eugene A. Silow, Irkutsk State University, Russia.

(2) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) R.Azhagu Raj, St.Xaviers College, India.

(2) Debkanta Ghosh, Vidyasagar College for Women, India.

(3) Adewirli Putra, Syedza Saintika University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pampa Bhattacharjee, Central Agricultural University( Imphal),India.

(2) Samad Sheikh, ICAR- Central Institute Of Fisheries Education, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.Azhagu Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debkanta Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adewirli Putra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (R.Azhagu Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Posterior Occipito-Cervical Liposuction Improves Mental Clarity and Prolongs Wakeful Working Time: Two Case Reports

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yasushi Shibata, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nabin Kumar Yadav, Jalal-Abad State University, Nepal.

(2) Misde Yola, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nabin Kumar Yadav, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Misde Yola, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effectiveness of Reading and Writing Literacy Using the Kirkpatrick Model at SMPN 1 Kuningan

Editor(s): 

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers: 

(1) J. Mano Ranjini Vishnu Priyan, GNIOT Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, India.

(2) Asep Nurjamin, Indonesian Institute of Education, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Mano Ranjini Vishnu Priyan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asep Nurjamin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategies of Driving Teachers in Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in Basic Education

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

(2) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Sule Muhammad, Federal University Gusau, Nigeria.

(2) Ma Chona S. Rizada, Palawan State University, Philippines.

(3) Zulbiye KACAY, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bright Asare, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Ghana.

(2) K Pushpa, India.

(3) Praveen Kumar T D, Doctor Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sule Muhammad, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ma Chona S. Rizada, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zulbiye KACAY, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Driving Teachers’ Innovative Strategies in Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in Basic Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayhan DUYGULU, Gazi University, Turkiye.

(2) Saba Khalil, National University of Modern Sciences, Pakistan.

(3) Tarika Nandedkar, IPS Academy, Institute of Business Management & Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayhan DUYGULU, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saba Khalil, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tarika Nandedkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparison of the Physico-Chemical and Microbiological Analyses of the Juice Obtained by Third-Year Students of the Science and Humanity School to Artisan and Industrial Juice Sold in Goma Food Stores after Six Months of Storage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof .  Angélica Machi Lazarin, State University of Maringá,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ekezie Okorigwe, University of Notre Dame, USA.

(2) Daniel Chinedu Nweze, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Aduragbemi Alabi, Georgia State University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ijeoma Charity Asilebo, University of Notre Dame, USA.

(2) N.Karpoora Sundara Pandian, College of Food and Dairy Technology, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(3) Nnachor, Amarachi Clare, Missouri University of Science and Technology, United State of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ekezie Okorigwe, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel Chinedu Nweze, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aduragbemi Alabi, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA