Peer Review History: Geospatial Assessment of LULC Dynamics and Land Surface Temperature Variations in KMA (2008–2024) Using Multi-source Satellite Data and Predictive Modeling

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustaq Ahmad Jabir Shaikh, Groundwater Surveys and Development Agency, India.

(2) Abdiaziz Hassan Nur, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation Somalia , Somalia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khin Mar Yee, University of Mandalay, Myanmar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustaq Ahmad Jabir Shaikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdiaziz Hassan Nur, Somalia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Storage-Induced Changes in Raw vs. Commercial Spirulina: A Molecular, Nutritional and Microbial Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Raju Dubaji Rathod, India.

(2) Teja. G, Andhra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raju Dubaji Rathod, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Teja. G, Andhra University, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Regression Analysis to Explore the Relationship Between Combustible Gas in Insulating Oil of Power Transformers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Huan-Liang Tsai, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Omeje,  Crescent  Onyebuchi, Nigeria.

(2) Cherubala Rusumba Bienvenu, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B A Parate, ARDE Pune, India.

(2) Priyesh Kumar Pandey, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omeje,  Crescent  Onyebuchi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cherubala Rusumba Bienvenu, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Imaging Modalities for Locating Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Critical Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Mahfuri, Damascus University, Syria.

(2) Veeresh M, Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, India.

(3) Dhanashree Dalal, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College and Hospital , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Koushik Mukherjee, West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Vanishree B K, Maharashtra University Of Health and Sciences (MUHS), India.

(3) Allaa Hussein Mhdi, Al-iraqia University College of Dentistry, Iraq.

(4) Anahita Punj, Army College of Dental Sciences, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, India.

(5) Erni Puspanantasari Putri, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945, Indonesia.

(6) Gopala Krishna Ganta, University of Michigan, USA.

(7) Jegathambigai Rameshwar Naidu, Perdana University, Malaysia.

(8) Muhammad Waseem, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(9) S. Vijayalakshmi, Sri Sarada College For Women (AUTONOMOUS), India.

(10) Sunny Mavi, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences & Research, India.

(11) Veeresh M, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, India.

(12) Zhaklina Mencheva, MIT University, North Republic of Macedonia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Mahfuri, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veeresh M, India ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhanashree Dalal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Parametric and AMMI Models for Genotype x Environment (G x E) Interaction in Mulberry

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Ramya, MTCA, India.

(2) Devkar Angad Ganeshrao., Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhabendra Kumar Biswas, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Keerti Kulkarni, BNM Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.Ramya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devkar Angad Ganeshrao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Numerical Performance Characteristic of Embedded Convex Rigid-ring Baffle in Long Moving Vessels

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  David Armando Contreras-Solorio, University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Saeed Sayehvand, Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran.

(2) Ahmed Rasheed Khlefha, University of Sumer, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nekrouf Abderrahim Sidi Mohammed, University of Sciences and Technology of Oran Mohamed Boudiaf, Algeria.

(2) Ali  Kadhim Qasim Al Sharea, Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saeed Sayehvand, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Rasheed Khlefha, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Management Strategies for Nosema bombycis in Bombyx mori: Diagnostics, Probiotics and Chemical Controls

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. N. Karunakaran, People Institute of Management Studies (PIMS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushmita Banra, Ranchi University, India.

(2) Minassou Juvenal Ahouandjinou, Cotonou Entomological Research Center, Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syed Khalid Mustafa, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushmita Banra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Minassou Juvenal Ahouandjinou, Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Lemongrass Essential Oil Edible Coating to Improve Quality of Minimally Processed Pomegranate Arils

Editor(s):

(1)Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Fadhil, College of Medical Technology, The Islamic University, Iraq.

(2) R. T. Patil, ICAR-CIPHET, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdolmajid Fadaei, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Denis M.K. Amara, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

(3) Senthilkumar Palanisamy, Sabanci University Nanotechnology Research and Application Center, Turkey.

(4) Shruti Ashok Padghan, India.

(5) Tilak Raj Rana, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fadhil, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. T. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phosphorus and Biofertilizer Management for Enhanced Growth, Yield and Profitability of Irrigated Blackgram

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Luis Javier Martínez Morales, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México.

(2) Vikas Sharma, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luis Javier Martínez Morales, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikas Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) and organic substances on seed germination and shoot growth of Custard Apple (Annona squamosa L.) seedlings under shade net condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar , Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed Mohammed, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arun Kumar , India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abeer Abdelaty Ahmed Mohammed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA