Peer Review History: Morphological characterization of garden pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense) genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Anjali Kumari Jha, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Sharath M N , University of Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, College of Agriculture, AL -Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anjali Kumari Jha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sharath M N, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Nitrogen and Basal Phosphorus Fertilization on Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Soybean in Vertisols of the Mewar Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

(2) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar , Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mahmoud Atef Saleh, Egypt.

(3) Mohammad Ali Khalaj, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré (UNIVC), Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahmoud Atef Saleh, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad Ali Khalaj, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategies used by the Institute of Adult Education to promote gender balance in Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nina I. Adriano, Dalubhasaang Politekniko Ng Lungsod Ng Baliwag, Philippines.

(2) SriPradha G, Guru Nanak College, India.

(3) Leebana Gracy. I, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sadife Çınkır, Türkiye.

(2) Tafadzwa Samantha Mutanga, Harare Institute of Technology, Zimbabwe.

(3) Mulenga Alexander, University Of Zambia, Zambia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (SriPradha G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Leebana Gracy. I, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Acculturation Attitudes, Psychological and Social Well-being of Ao and Lotha Tribes in Nagaland

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Santhosh Gugulothu, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, India.

(2) Choo Yeong Khong, INTI International University, Malaysia.

(3) Pham Van Loi, Institute of Vietnamese Studies and Development Sciences, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andri Ashadi, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia.

(2) Muchammad Ulin nuha, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Santhosh Gugulothu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Choo Yeong Khong, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pham Van Loi, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Organic Treatments on Growth, Yield and Quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculetus L.) in Prayagraj Region

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar  Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rey A. Castillo, University of Southeastern Philippines, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dinesh Dhakshanamurthy, ICAR IISWC, Research Centre Vasad, India.

(2) J Sinthiya, Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science, India.

(3) Karishma Das, SCSCA, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rey A. Castillo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Learning to Livelihood: Youth Training in Food Processing Technologies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Aakriti Tamrakar, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Lowelyn Q. Estoquia, North Eastern Mindanao State University-Cagwait Campus, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Kumar Gupta, Rani Lakshami Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aakriti Tamrakar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bolarin Funmilola Mary, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lowelyn Q. Estoquia, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study the Consumption Pattern and Attitude of Salt in Participants Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University Lucknow, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Huda Hameed Kadhim Alabbody, University of Baghdad, Iraq

(2) Omosanya Olusegun Emmanuel, Federal Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Huda Hameed Kadhim Alabbody, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Omosanya Olusegun Emmanuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | JOURNAL CHANGE TO AIR from JSRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Plant Growth Regulators and Organic Manures on Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Samir Pratap Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Bharat Lal, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samir Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bharat Lal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with multiple liver metastases: a rare case report with literature review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Budhi Ida Bagus, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta,Indonesian.

Reviewers:

(1) Nicolas Jarufe, Chile.

(2) T.V. Rajya Lakshmi, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gonzalo Medina Bueno, UJniversitat of Barcelona, Spain.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nicolas Jarufe, Chile) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.V. Rajya Lakshmi, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study on the Physio-chemical and Toxicological Properties of Agaricus bisporus (edible) and Amanita phalloides (non-edible) Mushrooms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gireesh Tripathi, Shri Krishna University, India.

(2) Bidhan Chandra Roy, India.

(3) T.Purushoth Prabhu, Tamilnadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nasriadi Dali, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia.

(2) Shilpa Sood, MCM DAV College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gireesh Tripathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bidhan Chandra Roy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T.Purushoth Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA