Peer Review History: Carpobrotus edulis Biosafety and Potency against Common Pancreatic Insufficiency Biomarkers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) N Sampathkumar, SSM College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Jayashri Yuvaraj Jadhav, University of Mumbai, India.

(3) Dharmasoth Rama Devi, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(4) Nguyen Minh Trung, Viet Nam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shashwat Pandey, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N Sampathkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jayashri Yuvaraj Jadhav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dharmasoth Rama Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nguyen Minh Trung, Viet Nam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eco-Friendly Biosynthesis of Anti-Mycobacterium Silver Nanoparticles Using Ficus Ingens for Potential use in Tuberculosis and Leprosy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, National university of Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Somkant Vasantrao Jawarkar, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

(2) Noor R Abady, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(3) Omeoga C. Humphrey, University at Albany, The United States.

(4) Saba A. Habeeb, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Entidhar Jasim Khmees, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Javeed Kakroo, Kidney and Urological Research Centre, India.

(3) Jenan Hussein Taha, Colloge of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(4) Laxmikant Kamble, SRTM University, India.

(5) Neihaya Heikmat Zaki, Mustansiriyah University- College of Science, Iraq.

(6) Rupali Taur, Institute of Biosciences and Technology MGM University, India.

(7) V.Nagasinduja, Jayamadhi College of Allied Health Science, Namakkal, Under The TamilNadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Somkant Vasantrao Jawarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noor R Abady, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Omeoga C. Humphrey, The United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Saba A. Habeeb, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioactivity and Safety of Hydro-methanolic Lyophilised Solanum incanum

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramana Hechhu, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Technology, Mallareddy Vishwavidyapeeth, India.

(2) Akleshwar Mathur, India.

(3) Enema Onojah John, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sardar Hussain, Maharanis Science College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramana Hechhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akleshwar Mathur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Enema Onojah John, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Toxicological and Histopathological Analysis of Neem Leaf Extract and Edible Camphor on the Liver of Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tran Van Minh, Vietnam.

(2) Honey Jajo, India.

(3) Munish Goyal, Aakash Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abeer Shokeer, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tran Van Minh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Honey Jajo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Munish Goyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Methods in the Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis Infections among Female Internally Displaced Persons Camps in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) AMAILA QAISAR, Riphah International University, Pakistan.

(2) Pooja Suri, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, USA.

(3) Selvaraj Stephen, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth deemed –to-be- University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (AMAILA QAISAR, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja Suri, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Selvaraj Stephen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal change to AJRID from JAMMR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Present Status and Upcoming Research Strategies for Nepal’s Winter Legume Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Sabry Mohamed, Egypt.

(2) Temesgen Bedassa Gudeta , Ethiopia.

(3) Nishtha Seth, Bareilly College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hakan Ulukan, University of Ankara, Turkey.

(2) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(3) Mohamed Milad Mohamed Draweel, University of Tripoli, Libya.

(4) Raquel Casaes, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Brazil.

(5) Trilok Nath Rai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asmaa Sabry Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Temesgen Bedassa Gudeta, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nishtha Seth, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Piliostigma thonningii biosafety and efficacy on common actinic damage endpoints

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, RGUHS, India.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Thirumalai, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Chadi Khatib, Syria.

(3) S.A.Vadivel, Surya School of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.R.Senapati, Agro Polytechnic Center, OUAT, India.

(2) Nuning Rahmawati, Nationah Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Thirumalai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chadi Khatib, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.A.Vadivel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antifungal Activity and Biosafety Assessment of Vernonia adoensis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences,India.

Reviewers:

(1) Stephen Ngigi Mburu, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Ifreke Mfon Udofia, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdisha Abrahim Adame, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stephen Ngigi Mburu, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ifreke Mfon Udofia, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Virtual Healthcare Assistants

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Özlem Gürünlü Alma, Muğla Sıtkı Kocman University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(3) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Yonas Getenet Bekele, United World Colleges (UWC International), United Kingdom.

(2) Arajit Saha, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Bangladesh.

(3) Sonia Rajoria, Center for Legal Studies Gitarattan International Business School Affiliated under GGSIPU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Carlos A. Nevarez, SevaTechnology LLC, U.S.A.

(2) Neeta Nathani, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yonas Getenet Bekele, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arajit Saha, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sonia Rajoria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Foliar Application of Different Organic Liquid Formulation on Growth of Black Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeraj Nath Parihar, Sardar Patel University Balaghat, India.

(2) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

(3) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D. Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(4) Muzamil Yousuf, Sher e Kashmir University of Agricultural sciences and Technology of Jammu (J&K) India, India.

Additional Reviewers: 

(1) Arturo O. Manipon, Philippines.

(2) Cornelius Orjighjigh Ishar, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Sri Hartatik, University of Jember, Indonesia.

(4) Tibor József Aranyos, University of Debrecen, Hungary.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeraj Nath Parihar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Muzamil Yousuf, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA