Peer Review History: Epidemiology of Community Acquired Pneumonia in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria: A Retrospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zhiheng Zhou, Guangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Raji Queen Chidinma, Redeemers College of Technology and Management, Nigeria.

(2) Ashfaque Hossain, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, UAE.

(3) Jaydeep Mazumdar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raji Queen Chidinma, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashfaque Hossain, UAE) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jaydeep Mazumdar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Weed Dynamics in Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Various Non-Chemical Weed Management Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Osunleti, Samuel Oluwaseun, Edo State College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nigeria.

(2) Durgesh Kumar Maurya, SMS NDUA&T, India.

(3) Leyla IDIKUT, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osunleti, Samuel Oluwaseun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Durgesh Kumar Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Leyla IDIKUT, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes for Drought Tolerance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arash Mohammadi, Iran.

(2) Ali Asghari, Mohaghegh Ardabili Uni., Iran.

(3) Muhammad Zulkiffal, Pakistan Wheat Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arash Mohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Asghari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Zulkiffal, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In silico Pharmacophore Profiling of Embelia ribes and Gloriosa superba for Potential Therapeutic Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

(3) Dr. Patrizia Diana, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) E.Gayathiri, Guru Nanak College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Swamy C T, Captain Srinivasa Murthy Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(3) Anna Senrung, University of Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E.Gayathiri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swamy C T, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anna Senrung, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nano Urea on Growth and Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) under Vidarbha Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Midde Sai Kumar, Malla Reddy University, India.

(2) Mandeep Kumar, Rama University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Midde Sai Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mandeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Cucumber (Cucumis spp.) as Influenced by Row Arrangement and Weeding Regime Grown in Intercrop with Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench.] in Sudan Savanna

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Boitumelo Lekgoathi, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa.

(2) J. Sivanantha, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Timothy Unuigboje Esekhade, Rubber Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.27/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Boitumelo Lekgoathi, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Sivanantha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Timothy Unuigboje Esekhade, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Intraluminal Metastases in Gastric Cancer: A Rare Postoperative and Post-therapy Event

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) LIVIU DUBEI, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania.

(2) Antonio Costanzo, Ospedale Bolognini di Seriate, Italy.

(3) Ayman Ahmed Sakr, Menoufia University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (LIVIU DUBEI, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Antonio Costanzo, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ayman Ahmed Sakr, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Digital Media Influencers on Market Reach and Consumer Behaviour

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayush G K, St Aloysius (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Sheetal Bura, DYP International University, India.

(3) Saidu Idriss, Mai Idris Alooma Polytechnic, Geidam Yobe State, Nigeria.

(4) Swapna Datta Khan, NSHM Business School, NSHM Knowledge Campus, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayush G K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sheetal Bura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saidu Idriss, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Swapna Datta Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Status and Performance of e-NAM in India: An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aelena Takhellambam, GB. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Lalengkima, Mizoram University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aelena Takhellambam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lalengkima, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Adoption Levels of Recommended Cotton Cultivation Practices in Jamnagar District, Gujarat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Kumar Chourase, Makhanlal Chaturvedi National University of Journalism and Communication (MCNUJC), India.

(2) Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Kumar Chourase, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA