Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Bushra Saleem, Quaid-e-Azam University, Pakistan.

(2) Sabina Khatun, NIMS Institute Of Pharmacy, India.

(3) B. Senthil Kumar, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College & Hospitals, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bushra Saleem, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sabina Khatun, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B. Senthil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pratik Prasad Singh, IARI (Indian Agricultural Research Institute), India.

(2) Siddhant Gupta, GBPUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pratik Prasad Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Siddhant Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Patle, College of Agricultural Engineering, India.

(2) Sajad Ahmad Mir, University of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Patle, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajad Ahmad Mir, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohan Naik R, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

(2) Aditya Narayan Samanta, Abacus Institute of Engineering and Management, India.

(3) Myrtel S. Bernardo, Institute of Computer Studies, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohan Naik R, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Narayan Samanta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Myrtel S. Bernardo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, LalaLajpatRai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hind Dyia Hadi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) SM Kamruzzaman, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hind Dyia Hadi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (SM Kamruzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Umesh Kumar, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology Meerut, India.

(2) Amit Kumar Pandey, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Nusrat Jahan, Government Brojomohun College, Bangladesh.

(2) Judith Nneka Okafor, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Daniel Iheanyichukwu Kanu-Nwosu, Federal University Lokoja, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nusrat Jahan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Judith Nneka Okafor, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Daniel Iheanyichukwu Kanu-Nwosu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mabicka Obame Rolf Gael, Universite des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku, Gabon.

(2) Nazmunnaher Nipa, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(3) Akram Azaz, Tezpur University, India.

(4) Saidu Kamara, Ernest Bai Koroma University of Science and Technology, Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mabicka Obame Rolf Gael, Gabon) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazmunnaher Nipa, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akram Azaz, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Saidu Kamara, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Omar Jamal Mahdi, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Pooja S Beleri, University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omar Jamal Mahdi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja S Beleri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Damtew Bekele Eressi, Assistant Professor, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Reviewers:

(1) Reqgi First Trasia, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia.

(2) Bouchaala Laid, Environmental Research Center, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reqgi First Trasia, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bouchaala Laid, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA