Peer Review History: Narrative Analysis of Aboriginal Knowledge as A Tool for Learners’ Socialisation: Implications for Best Child-upbringing Practices in Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Tracey L. Haselau, The Independent Institute of Education, South Africa.

(2) Eric Bahufite, Rusangu University, Zambia.

(3) Tapan R Mohanty, National Law Institute University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chioma Elekwachi, National Open University, Nigeria.

(2) Meiti Subardhini, Politekenik Kesejahteraan Sosial, Indonesia.

(3) Heba Elsayed Abdelsalam Elghotmy, Menoufia University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tracey L. Haselau, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eric Bahufite, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tapan R Mohanty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Serving Nation through Farming: A Scope of Jai Jawan Kisan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sule Isin, Ege University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Umar Bala, Federal College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Kuswanto, Jambi University, Indonesia.

(3) H. Chandrashekar, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Barbara Carboni, University of Cagliari, Italy.

(2) Ismail UKAV, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umar Bala, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kuswanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (H. Chandrashekar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Jasmine Flower Extraction: A Review of Modern Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Nisha Deepak Patil, MET’S Institute of Engineering, India.

(2) Pulipati Sowjanya, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

(3) Sunita Khatak, UIET, Kurukshetra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) H. Mary Henrietta, Saveetha Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Jaswant Narendra Saxena, IIT Delhi, Yale University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nisha Deepak Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pulipati Sowjanya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunita Khatak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatial Distribution, Isolation, and Characterization of Morphological Variants of the Fusarium Wilt Pathogen in Brinjal Across Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University, India.

(2) Adarsh Pandey, Swami Shukdevanand College, MJPRU, India.

(3) Anupam Adarsh, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adarsh Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anupam Adarsh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Forecasting of Cropping Intensity of Kerala in India: A Multivariate Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) D. B. Shanmugam, SRM IST, India.

(2) Udaya Kumar Addanki, Anurag University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. B. Shanmugam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udaya Kumar Addanki, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eco-friendly Integrated Pest Management for Sucking Pest Complex and Defoliators in Groundnut: Insights from Mancherial Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Khamar, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) Bidyut Pritom Gogoi, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Khamar, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bidyut Pritom Gogoi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Anti-pyretic Effects of Ethanolic Extract of Sonchus wightianus DC Using Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandip Chatterjee, Narayan Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) V. Thirumalai, Rajas Dental College And Hospital, India.

(3) Jeevan R Rajguru, Delight Institute of Pharmacy Koregaon Bhima Pune, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandip Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Thirumalai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jeevan R Rajguru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Bacterial Endophytes of Tomato Plant for Bio-control and Growth Promoting Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hirdesh Kumar Sachan, Associate Professor, College of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Fiji National University, Fiji Islands.

Reviewers:

(1) Paras Shah, Hainan University, China.

(2) Alessandro Mattedi, University of Nottingham, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paras Shah, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alessandro Mattedi, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on SUS (Universal Health System) Primary Preventive Dental Care in Brazil during the First Two Years of the Pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Atrey J. Pai Khot, Goa Dental College and Hospital, India.

(2) Deepeeka Ghimire, Manav Rachna International Institute for Research Studies, Nepal.

(3) Nusrat Nobi, Northern University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atrey J. Pai Khot, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepeeka Ghimire, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nusrat Nobi, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Effects of Resveratrol in Aluminium Chloride-Induced Alzheimer-Type Neurodegeneration in Adult Male Wistar Rat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Kashmira J. Gohil, Director/Dean, Anand College of Pharmacy, Sharda Group of Institutions (SGI), Agra, India.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shweta Patel, Galgotias University, India.

(2) Shashikant Kharat, Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research Pimpri Pune, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shweta Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashikant Kharat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA