Peer Review History: Reform of College English Teaching Model: Embracing Mobile-Assisted Collaborative Language Learning

Editor(s):

(1 Dr.  Hiroko Kanoh, Associate Professor, Institute of Arts and Sciences,  National University Corporation, Yamagata University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkata Ramana Manipatruni, Sri Vasavi Engineering College, India.

(2) Angela Bayu Pertama Sari, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azliza Abdul Aziz, Polytechnic of Muadzam, Malaysia.

(2) Fahim Rahimi, Nangarhar University, Afghanistan.

(3) Manel Mizab, Echahid Echikh Larbi Tebessi, Tebessa University, Algeria.

(4) TG Nur Liyana Binti Tengku Mohamed Fauzi, Universiti Teknologi Mara Cawangan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkata Ramana Manipatruni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angela Bayu Pertama Sari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Advanced Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes against Pod Borers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) A.Nithish, SKLTGHU, India.

(2) Shradha Parmar, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(3) Amine Assouguem, Moulay Ismaïl University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.Nithish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shradha Parmar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amine Assouguem, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Critical Examination of Potentials and Pitfalls of Genetically Modified Foods

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Jithin Scaria, Nilgiri College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Karthick R, K.L.N. College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jithin Scaria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthick R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Saba senegalensis (A.DC) Pichon (Apocynaceae): Treatment of Loperamide-induced Constipation in Mice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Roshan Kumar Dubey, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Khulood Ayad Majeed, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(3) Bargale Sushant Sukumar, S D M college of Ayurveda and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roshan Kumar Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khulood Ayad Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bargale Sushant Sukumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dynamical Analysis of Delayed Autonomous and Non-Autonomous Oscillators

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sizar Abid Mohammed, University of Duhok, Iraq.

(2) Egunjobi, Abiodun Isiaka, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sizar Abid Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Egunjobi, Abiodun Isiaka, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Global Developmental Delay and the Impact of Overindulgence: A Case Series on Global Developmental Delay, the Excessive Pampering, and the Consequences of Overindulgence in Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Suratiya, India.

(2) Abraham Ngor Achiek, Texila American University, South Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Suratiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abraham Ngor Achiek, South Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Electronic Payment Channels on the Performance of Commercial Banks in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Charles Otieno Ndede, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology University, Kenya.

(2) Chinwendu Sopulu Divine, Redeemer’s University, Nigeria.

(3) Amina Momoh – Musa, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Suraj Gaudel, Pokhara University, Nepal.

(3) Uket Eko Ewa, University of Cross River State, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Charles Otieno Ndede, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinwendu Sopulu Divine, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amina Momoh – Musa, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Zinc Oxide Polyscale Designer Particulates and its Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed M. El Nady, Professor, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Shankar Rai, Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre, India.

(2) Parvin Gharbani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Shankar Rai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parvin Gharbani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Blockchain-based System for Secure Generation and Certification of Bank Cheques

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Dinesh Kumar, Vel Tech University, India.

(2) Juan Alfredo Lino Gamiño, Colima´s University, México.

(3) Aarti Rani, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

(4) Surendra Pandey, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Dinesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juan Alfredo Lino Gamiño, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aarti Rani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Surendra Pandey, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Personalization in Digital Marketing: Leveraging Machine Learning for E-Commerce

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Manish Mahajan, CGC College of Engineering, Landran, India.

(2) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hirenkumar Mistry, USA.

(2) Chandra Bhooshan Singh, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Mohammed Usman, CEMIS, University of Nizwa, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hirenkumar Mistry, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandra Bhooshan Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Usman, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA