Peer Review History: Tech-driven Sericulture: Merging Climate Resilience, Biotech and Nanotech for Sustainable Silk

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamidi Rahul, India.

(2) M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamidi Rahul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Challenges in Aligarh Locks Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinay Kumar Pal, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences Allahabad, India.

(2) Anupama Rajput, School of Engineering and Technology, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies, India.

(3) Md. Mohidul Islam, Faculty of World University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

(4) Seema G Hariramani, Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bijay Das, Arunodaya University, India.

(2) Saad A.hammad, University of Anbar, College of Agriculture, Iraq.

(3) Viacheslav Berezutskyi, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinay Kumar Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anupama Rajput, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Mohidul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Seema G Hariramani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Survival of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli Causing Bacterial Blight in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief, Sohag University, Egypt Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Basit, Pakistan.

(2) Lakshmi Priya S, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gul Sanat Shah, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Basit, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Priya S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Yield Gap and Impact Analysis of Rapeseed-Mustard in Senapati District, Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mashud Ahmed, Khairun Nessa Begum Women’s College, India.

(2) C. Karpagam, National Research Centre for Banana, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mashud Ahmed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Karpagam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pathogenic Characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii Isolates Causing Collar Rot of Chickpea in Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr. Md. Harun-Ur-Rashid, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andrea Veronica De Fatima Oviedo, Universidad Naciona de Tucumán, Argentina.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(3) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMVCN), Romania.

(4) Tarun Kanubhai Mandaviya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Measures of Resource Use Efficiency and Constraints of Mentha Crop Production in Ambedkar Nagar District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Cente, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Kumar Singh, Tilka Manjhi Agriculture College, India.

(2) Madhu, D. M., University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Das, SRI SRI University, India.

(2) Priyanka Das, United States.

(3) Rita Kapil Narvariya, Jawahar Lal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(4) Uyodhu Amekauma Victor-Edema, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Kumar Singh,  India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhu, D. M., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect Of Mixed Zooplankton (Daphnia/Moina) On The Growth Performance And Survival Of Hemigrammus Caudovitatus (Albino Buenos Aires Tetra)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fereidun Mohebbi, West Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

(2) Javed Gafur Khan Pathan, College of Fishery Science, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fereidun Mohebbi, Iran) | File 1File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Javed Gafur Khan Pathan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Secure Management of Patient Medical Records Using Blockchain Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang , Bohai University China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Shaw, Alliance University, India.

(2) Chanate Ratanaubol, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(3) Doan Van Dinh, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Slim chtioui, FSEG SFAX, Tunisia.

(2) Suwimon Kooptiwoot, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Shaw, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chanate Ratanaubol, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Doan Van Dinh,Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Stability-indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Development and Validation of Edoxaban

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Roheeda Amanullah Khan, Institute of Nursing Sciences Khyber Medical University, Pakistan.

(2) Vinay Kumar Yanmandru, Vijaya College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Rohini Mishra, IIMT College of Medical Sciences, IIMT University, India.

Additional Reviewers: 

(1) P. Ravisankar, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roheeda Amanullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay Kumar Yanmandru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rohini Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Heterosis and Combining Ability in Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Using Male Sterile Lines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashutosh Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shubham Maurya, College of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) AKM Quamruzzaman, Bangladesh.

(2) Danfulloh, Tundeno Barde, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashutosh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA