Peer Review History: Effects of the Adoption of Improved Poultry Management Practices on the Income and Livelihood of Poultry Farmers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Chakawekesa, Kalro Biotechnology Research Institute, Kenya.

(2) Jyotsana, LUVAS, India.

(3) Sababa Fatima, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi AREMU, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) K Pushpa, IndoGerman Global Academy for Agroecology Research and Learning, India.

(3) Milena Milojević, Republic of Serbia.

(4) Rambabu Dharavath, PV Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Chakawekesa, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyotsana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sababa Fatima, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examining Students’ Study Habits and Their Impact on Performance in Chemistry Examination in Bungoma County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Syahban Amir, Institut Turatea, Indonesia.

(2) Gunawan, Universitas Muhamamdiyah Bone, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ericka Darmawan, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Syahban Amir, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gunawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of High Tech Innovation Strategies in Leading Asian Economies and Implications for Uzbekistan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhushy Thillaivasan, Australia.

(2) Zdzislaw W. Puslecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(3) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.Kalaiselvi, Vellalar college for women Thindal, India.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhushy Thillaivasan, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zdzislaw W. Puslecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Slim Chtioui, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Cropping System and the Farming Diversity of the Spinach Grown in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Irshad Ali Saudagar, ICFRE-TFRI, Jabalpur, India.

(2) Lamria Sidauruk, Methodist University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Saba, King AbdulAziz University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Irshad Ali Saudagar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lamria Sidauruk, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Promoting Intangible Cultural Heritage through New Media: A Case Study of Nuo Culture Dissemination by a Chinese NGO

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vincenzo De Masi, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Italy.

(2) Ali Mohammed Salih, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(3) Wu Jiabao, Changzhou College of Information Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dimple Khokhar, RIMT University, India.

(2) Oluseun Sunday Odusanya, Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vincenzo De Masi, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Mohammed Salih, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wu Jiabao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1(No Response) | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3 (Wu Jiabao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Reception: A Meta-Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarik A. A. Hassan, Egypt.

(2) Jyoti Dattatray Anap , India.

(3) Jenila Rani,  Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dipak Dadasaheb Nalawade, Dr.kolpe institute of pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  7.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tarik A. A. Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Dattatray Anap , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jenila Rani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of sanitation and Hygiene-related Practices on the Prevalence of Intestinal Helminthes in IDP Camps and Adjourning Host Communities in Benue State Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab, Assiut University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Christiana  Chinyere Okonofua, Crawford University Faith City Igbesa, Nigeria.

(2) Mohammad Hossein Feiz-Haddad, Ahvaz Jundi Shapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alaa hamady obeid Al-Taei, College of Pharmacy, University of Babylon, India.

(2) Zuhair Dardona, Israa University, Palestine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Christiana Chinyere Okonofua, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Hossein Feiz-Haddad, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Infrastructure Facilities, Awareness, and Consumer Purchasing Behaviour in Organized Retail Stores – feedback of Dairy and Food Consumers of in Anand City

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Banco Bpm, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kirti Dang Longani, Akemi Business School, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Manu Bharadwaj V, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Isaac Baidoo, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kirti Dang Longani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manu Bharadwaj V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biotechnology in Fisheries and Aquaculture: A Holistic Review of Innovations in Health, Nutrition, and Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulmalik A. Oladipupo, Auburn University, USA.

(2) Modi Kiran Piyushbhai, ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, India.

(3) Indulata Tekam, College of Fisheries Science, Dholi, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulmalik A. Oladipupo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Modi Kiran Piyushbhai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Indulata Tekam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Biochar Effects on Essential Nutrient Uptake in Chickpea Under Field Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, , Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) A Rajasekaran, Institute of Forest Genetics & Tree Breeding, India.

(2) Deepak Maurya, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A Rajasekaran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Maurya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA