Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rohit Kumar Pal, ADAMAS University, India.

(2) Rinku Nath, Central University of South Bihar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jerald C Moneva, University of the Visayas, Jagobiao National High School, Philippians.

(2) Pranaykumar Vinodbhai Patelx, R.H. Patel English Medium B.Ed. College, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rohit Kumar Pal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rinku Nath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | J.Ch. to SAJSSE from AJESS | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University,  Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Liu, Yi-Yi, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Ruth G. Luciano, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Liu, Yi-Yi, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruth G. Luciano, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Renjith Kumar. R, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Nizwa.

(2) D B. Keerthana, Sri Sairam Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Renjith Kumar. R, Nizwa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D B. Keerthana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Fredrick Kabwe, Delhi Technological University, India.

(2) Okezie Aloysius Ihugba, Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Subramaniya Siva A, Annamalai University Chidambaram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fredrick Kabwe, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Okezie Aloysius Ihugba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Subramaniya Siva A, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan

Reviewers:

(1) Anam Zehra, Jamia Millia Islamia, India.

(2) Mohammad Jashim Uddin, Northern University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

(3) Amor Hasic, University of Novi Pazar, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kelzang, Thrimshing Higher Secondary School, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anam Zehra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Jashim Uddin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amor Hasic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan

Reviewers:

(1) Sakila Akter Jahan, Illinois State University, USA.

(2) Mesbaul Haque Sazu, Case Western Reserve University, USA.

(3) David Umoru, Edo State University Uzairue, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) James A Danowski, University of Illinois, USA.

(2) Umar Kasamba, Mulungushi University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sakila Akter Jahan, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mesbaul Haque Sazu, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (David Umoru, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Reviewers:

(1) Sulani Silva de Souza, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brazil.

(2) Puja Singh, Bundelkhand Medical College, India.

(3) Yannick Eba Obam, University of Yaoundé I, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jelena Petrovic Sunderic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sulani Silva de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Puja Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yannick Eba Obam, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmadreza Kheradpishe, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Skerdi Prifti, University of Medicine, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmadreza Kheradpishe, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Skerdi Prifti, Albania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Kirolos Eskandar, Helwan University, Egypt.

(2) Atar Singh Kushwah, Women’s Biomedical Research Institute, USA.

(3) Lorenzo Martini, Italy.

(4) Premkumar Daivasikamani, Zhengzhou Shuqing Medical College, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Natalia Camejo, Hospital de Clínicas , Uruguay.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kirolos Eskandar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atar Singh Kushwah, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lorenzo Martini, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Premkumar Daivasikamani, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan

Reviewers:

(1) Shashwat Prafulla Mahalle, MPKV, India.

(2) Satish Chandra Narayan, India.

(3) Sharvan Kumar, Invertis University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nurul Puspita Palupi, Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia.

(2) Pradeep Kumar, ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, India.

(3) V.S.Devadas, GIET University Odisha, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shashwat Prafulla Mahalle, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satish Chandra Narayan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sharvan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA