Peer Review History: Studies on the Nutritional Profile of Shea Caterpillars [Cirina butyrospermii, Vuillet (1960)]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Benedict Terkula, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia.

(2) Daniela STOIN, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(3) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Foluso Aderibigbe, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Shakila Banu.M, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Benedict Terkula, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniela STOIN, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Rare Case of Mature Cystic Neonatal Sacrococcygeal Teratoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) I Wayan Niryana, Ngoerah Hospital, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(2) Fatima Tuz Zahra Shakir, Pakistan.

(3) Madhumita Mukhopadhyay, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (I Wayan Niryana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatima Tuz Zahra Shakir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madhumita Mukhopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical Quality of Whey Beverage Using Kinnow Juice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Thorat, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Kidist Fikre Worku, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saba Zafarm, Changchun University of Science and technology, P. R China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep Thorat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kidist Fikre Worku, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Digital Marketing through Machine Learning in Cloud-Based Enterprise Systems: The Role of Web Technologies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Noura ABDAOUI, University of Manouba, Tunisia.

(2) Anil Kumar Chikatimarla, A.G. & S.G. Siddhartha Degree College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandrashekar Pandugula, USA.

(2) K.Malathi, Saveethha Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noura ABDAOUI, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar Chikatimarla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Feasibility of Using Ambient Temperature Semen and Prostaglandin-Based Synchronisation in Beef Cattle under Tropical Conditions of Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, UENF, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Thabang Luther Mashilo, University of the Free State, South Africa.

(2) Kirana Dara Dinanti Adiputra, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(3) Madhu Shivhare, College of Veterinary Science and AH, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thabang Luther Mashilo, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kirana Dara Dinanti Adiputra, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madhu Shivhare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Glucosamine Hydrochloride from Biowaste of Macrobrachium rosenbergii and Penaeus monodon in Different Ponds of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Z. Elwakeel, University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Vasugi Neelan, University of Madras, India.

(3) M. Jaya Rajan, AnnaiVelankanni College, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gagan Singh Guru, Government Digvijay Autonomous Postgraduate College, India.

(2) Olugbojo, Joseph Abiodun, Bells University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Z. Elwakeel, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vasugi Neelan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Jaya Rajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Heterotic Performance and Inbreeding Depression for Grain Yield and Contributing Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University,Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Goshime Muluneh Mekasha, Ethiopian Institute of Agriculture Research, Ethiopia.

(2) Radhey Shyam Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ranju Kumari, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Goshime Muluneh Mekasha, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radhey Shyam Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ranju Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Leaf Webber and Capsule Borer Infestation on Yield Potential of Promising Sesame Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) B.Karthick Mani Bharathi, Forest College And Research Institute, India.

(2) Shiv kumar shivandu, ICAR IARI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.Karthick Mani Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiv kumar shivandu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: IoT-based Yield Monitoring of Mulberry Silkworm Using Image Processing Technique

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Gagan Singh Guru, Government Digvijay Autonomous Postgraduate College, India.

(2) Tareque Rahaman, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anekwong Yoddumnern, Thailand.

(2) Fahmi Akmal Bin Dzulkifli, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gagan Singh Guru, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tareque Rahaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Analysis of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus tereticornis S.) Based Agroforestry System in Chhattisgarh Plain

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpa Mathew, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Somanath Sarvade, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpa Mathew, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Somanath Sarvade, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA