Peer Review History: Perceptions of Pregnant Women on the Influence of Health Literacy in Family Planning Use: A Case of Akheri Ward, Arumeru District, Arusha, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mathoka Khaile, Lesotho.

(2) Muhammad Ishaque, Pakistan.

(3) Dessalegn Nigatu, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dessalegn Nigatu, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Doris Eseoghene Ikogho, Delta State University, Nigeria.

(3) Ifeoma Ofurum, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(4) Olutayo Folashade Martins, School of Basic Medical and Health Sciences, American University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mathoka Khaile, Lesotho) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Ishaque, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dessalegn Nigatu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Prolonged Emergency Department Stays Due to ICU Bed Shortage on Patient Outcomes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Yatin Talwar, SMVDIME, India.

(2) Abdulai Alpha Jalloh, Sierra Leone.

(3) Getachew Melakie Akele, Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Ali Majdoddin, Guilan University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yatin Talwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulai Alpha Jalloh, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Getachew Melakie Akele, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Fish Invasions in the Ganges: Molecular Detection and Surveillance of Juvenile Invasive Species Using DNA Barcoding

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palanisamy Arulselvan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Naeem, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan.

(2) Dagne Tarle Tarse, School of Chemical and Bio Engineering, Addis Ababa University Institute of Technology (AAiT), Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Naeem, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dagne Tarle Tarse, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Climate Change Adaptation through Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Practices: Evidence from Coffee Farming Households in Southwestern Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Hedieh Alavitalab, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Muhammad Romadhon, Kader Bangsa University, Indonesia.

(3) Tajebe Mosie Gelaw, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sagar S Pujar, UAS, India.

(2) Somashekhargouda Patil, India.

(3) Tahsin Ertas, Adiyaman University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hedieh Alavitalab, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Romadhon, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tajebe Mosie Gelaw, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Potential Action of Defence Enzyme in Biotic Stress: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyam Vandana, ICAR-IISR, India.

(2) Simran Kirti, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyam Vandana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simran Kirti, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emerging Plant Hormones: Opening up New Lanes to Face Abiotic Stresses

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, TrippBio, Inc. USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Manish Kumar, Carrer Point University Kota, India.

(2) Data Ram Saini, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sana Batool, The Government Sadiq College Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Data Ram Saini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Nutrient uptake of Chrysanthemum var. Marigold through Phenophase-based Irrigation and Fertigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramesh Kumar Kushwaha, REVA University, India.

(2) Kiran Patnaik, Odisha university of agriculture and technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramesh Kumar Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kiran Patnaik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Proof of Medical Negligence in Nigeria: Legal and Procedural Considerations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Izwan Ikhsan, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(2) Olaide Awwal-Bolanta, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(3) Dumitrescu Radu Mihai, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Izwan Ikhsan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olaide Awwal-Bolanta, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dumitrescu Radu Mihai, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioactive, Microbiological and Organoleptic Characteristics of Kiwi Lemongrass Blended Nectar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Akinyele, Adijat Adeola, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Sina Ardebilchi Marand, Urmia University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Behzad Mohammadi, Afagh Higher Education Institute, Iran.

(2) Bogdan-Vlad Avarvarei, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

(3) Deepa K, Mercy College Palakkad, India.

(4) Dhruv Juyal, Sparsh Himalaya University, India.

(5) Eli Zughumnaan Well, Benue State University Makurdi, (Centre for Food Technology and Research, (CEFTER), Nigeria.

(6) Ukoro Frank O, Akperan Orshi Polytechnic Yandev, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akinyele, Adijat Adeola, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sina Ardebilchi Marand, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA