Peer Review History: Evaluation of Physico-Chemical Attributes of Aonla (Emblica officinalis L.) Genotypes Under Eastern Uttar Pradesh Agro-Climatic Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Swathi V, Narasaraopeta Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) A. Y. Sahare, Bajiraoji Karanjekar College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ravindra Kumar Tiwari, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Surabhi Yadav, Bipin Bihari College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swathi V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Y. Sahare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SWEET Genes in Fruit Crops: Evolution, Mechanisms, and Agricultural Significance

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University,Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Uma Kant Singh, Bihar Forestry College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Imamuddin Shah, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uma Kant Singh, India) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imamuddin Shah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation Study of Reclamation Success on Former Coal Mine Land of PT. Komunitas Bangun Bersama Batuah Village, Loa Janan District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan , Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyadarshan Sham Ganvir, Mahatma Gandhi Arts, Science and Late N. P. Commerce College, India.

(2) Mohamed Ismail Abdel-Ghaffar Fayed, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Michael Manja Williams, Biota Conservation Hub Foundation (BiotaCHF), Nigeria.

(2) Rae Osborn, South Africa.

(3) Rahul Ratnakar Mahamuni, Gopinathrao Munde  National Institute of Rural Development and Research- A Constitute Institute of Dr. B.A.M. University, India.

(4) R. S. Chaurasia, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyadarshan Sham Ganvir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamed Ismail Abdel-Ghaffar Fayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnobotanical Knowledge and Food Uses of Garcinia afzelii Fruits in Vavoua, Haut-Sassandra Region, Ivory Coast

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Government College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chadi Khatib, Manara University, Syria.

(2) T.Purushoth Prabhu, The Tamil Nadu Dr M G R Medical University, India.

(3) Deepak Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akinlolu Bankole Fawehinmi, Nigeria Natural Medicine Development Agency, Nigeria.

(2) Dayanidhi Bagartee, India.

(3) Kalu Michael Kalu, Nigeria.

(4) Poonam Nilesh Chougule, Ashokrao Mane College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Rama Shankar, Patanjali Research Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chadi Khatib, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.Purushoth Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deepak Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Properties of Plant-Derived Compounds against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh Sonawane, Divine College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Chizi L. Ndimele, Royal Cornwall Hospital, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jerusha Stephen, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganesh Sonawane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chizi L. Ndimele, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening: An Assessment of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Non-Medical Students of Ebonyi State University, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Katwesige Wycliff, Euclid University, Uganda.

(2) Gbonjubola Owolabi, Oyo State College of Nursing Sciences, Nigeria.

(3) Sahar Jassim Abid, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Katwesige Wycliff, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gbonjubola Owolabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sahar Jassim Abid, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Trend of Fish and Fish Seed Production in Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, , Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Javan Ominde, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Kenya.

(2) Boniga Mohan Uday Raj, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Javan Ominde, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Boniga Mohan Uday Raj, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: EngageNet: A Model for Evaluating Student Engagement through Facial Expression and Behavior Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Liu Mingyang, Dalian Polytechnic University, China.

(2) Akshay Shankar Agrawal, University of Mumbai, India.

(3) Manisha Babanrao Thombare, India.

(4) Wan Ab Aziz Bin Wan Daud, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Goyani, Government Engineering College, Modasa, India.

(2) Zulkifli Musannip Efendi Siregar, Universitas Labuhanbatu, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Liu Mingyang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akshay Shankar Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manisha Babanrao Thombare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Wan Ab Aziz Bin Wan Daud, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adoption of Futuristic Strategies by the Community Banks to Combat Competitive Challenges in USA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravichandran Ramadass, School of Commerce Studies, Jain University, India.

(2) Shwetha S M, East Point College of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Michael Chiphwanya, Malawi.

(2) Tahir Sikander Rahim, Alhamd Islamic University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravichandran Ramadass, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shwetha S M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Liquid Biofertilizers on Nutrition of Finger Millet and Residual Soil Fertility Status

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Ajay Kumar, ICAR-CRIDA, India.

(2) Mrinal Choudhury, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (E. Ajay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mrinal Choudhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA