Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Optimizing Rapeseed Productivity through Sowing Date Adjustment and Agro-climatic Indices Moderation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuldeep Singh, Smt. Sugrata Wanjari Mahila Mahavidyalaya, RTM University of Nagpur, India.

(2) Godavari Bhavani Naga Jyothi, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Roheela Ahmad, Shere Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joshua Oluremi Odedeji, University of Medical Sciences Ondo City, Nigeria.

(2) Payal Bhautik, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kuldeep Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Godavari Bhavani Naga Jyothi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roheela Ahmad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Intercropping and Nutrient Management on Weed Control and Yield in Cassava Based Production Systems

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Duyu Monya, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.

(2) Yogesh Kumar, Bihar Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Duyu Monya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence and Management of Pear Psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola Foerster, Hemiptera, Psyllidae) in Kashmir, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mawra Nadeem, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

(2) C. Selvaraj, India.

(3) Gyan Prakash Morya, Vital Biotech Research & Training Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arup Khakhlari, Bodoland University, India.

(2) Hanan Salah El-Din Taha, Agriculture Research Center, Central Agricultural Pesticide Laboratory, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mawra Nadeem, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Selvaraj, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gyan Prakash Morya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Weed Management Effects through Regression Analysis in Black Gram

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikhil Digambar Solanke, Govt. College of Food Technology, India.

(2) Nagaraja O, KLE’S  Jagadguru Tontadarya  College, India.

(3) Sourabh Munnoli, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gajanand, MPUAT, India.

(2) Ramandeep Singh, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikhil Digambar Solanke, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagaraja O, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sourabh Munnoli, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Influence of Different Packing Materials on Quality Parameters of Jackfruit Based Blended Fruit Leasther during Storage

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkata Satish Kuchi, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.

(2) Mahesh Balasaheb Chougule, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkata Satish Kuchi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Balasaheb Chougule, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Biochemical and Physiological Traits of Native Spine Gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb.) Genotypes from the North-Eastern Region of India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Olatunji Bukola Funmilola, Nigeria.

(2) Manish Kumar Vijay, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) KRM Swamy, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India.

(2) Rajiv Dutta, Shobhit University, India.

(3) Utkarsh Ghate, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olatunji Bukola Funmilola, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar Vijay, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Key Challenges and Opportunities in Horticulture-Based Ecotourism Development in the Ulavapadu Region of Andhra Pradesh, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishna Kumar Verma, Central Universitry of Himachal Pradesh, India.

(2) Krishna D K, BAU Sabour, India.

(3) Mehtab Alam, National University of Science and Technology (NUST) Islamabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishna Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna D K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehtab Alam, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA