Peer Review History: Development of Early Maturing and High Yielder Finger Millet Cultivar (VL Mandua 400)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Bishal Kumar Mishra, Ganaga Nagar Meerut, India.

(2) Sakka Samudin, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bishal Kumar Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sakka Samudin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Floriculture: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhang Salehi, Iran.

(2) Sathya Kannan, United States.

(3) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(4) Atul Pachauri, Sanjeev Agrawal Global Educational University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farhang Salehi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sathya Kannan, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Atul Pachauri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Titrimetric Methods for Quantifying Acetylsalicylic Acid in Aspirin Tablets

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wolfgang Linert(Retd.), Vienna University of Technology, Europe.

(2) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Subhash Patil, Shri D D Vispute College of Pharmacy and Research Center, Mumbai University, India

(2) Vijay Kumar, All India Institute of Medical sciences, India

(3) Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Subhash Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammed Mizher Radhi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Motivational Factors Influencing Research Productivity among Higher Education Faculty

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) G N Manjunath, Sri Siddhartha Medical College affiliated to Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, India.

(2) Inedu Abraham Idoko, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria.

(3) Ashok S Chaudhary, Ayurved University Jamnagar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bindu Dogra, Mehr Chand Mahajan DAV College for Women Sector -36 Chandigarh, India.

(2) Leo Mendel D. Rosario, University of the Philippines Open University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G N Manjunath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Inedu Abraham Idoko, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashok S Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Two-Way Repeated Measures Mixed ANOVA: Insights for Medical Researchers Using Simulations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giou-Teng, Yiang, Tzu Chi University,  Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Swetha. N, University of Madras, India.

(2) Noha Mohammed Ismael Awad El-Adl, National Research Centre, Egypt-Cairo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kapil Dilip Muley, Care Ciigma Hospitals, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swetha. N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noha Mohammed Ismael Awad El-Adl, Egypt-Cairo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Storage Fungi Occurrence in Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) Calyx and Effects on it’s Composition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Olabisi Omowumi Adebisi, New Mexico State University, USA.

(2) Siti Nur Azizah, Politeknik Kesehatan Jember, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A. Fulzele, SMM College of Science, India.

(2) Vivek Anand, T. N. B. College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olabisi Omowumi Adebisi, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Siti Nur Azizah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of the Restriction of Agro-chemical Supply on Sri Lankan Agriculture: A Case Study on Vegetable Production at Hanguranketha Divisional Secretariat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Anayatullah Nayaji, Ch.B.P. Government Engineering College, India.

(2) Alexander Sagaydak, State University of Land Use Planning, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anayatullah Nayaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alexander Sagaydak, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Influence of School Feeding Programs on Pupils’ Academic Engagement in Arusha District, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Bindeswar Prasad Lekhak, Waseda University, Japan.

(2) Gregorio A. Reyes, Polytechnic University of the Phlippines, Phlippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bindeswar Prasad Lekhak, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gregorio A. Reyes, Phlippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-economic Impact of Technological Interventions on Sheep Farming Productivity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Olympica Sarma, M R College of Veterinary Sciences and Research Centre, India.

(2) Kiran Kotyal, Institute of Agri-Business Management, University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, India.

(3) John Atsu Agbolosoo, Egerton University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Toure Donatie Serge, Peleforo Gon Coulibaly University, Cote d’Ivoire.

(2) Simon T. Sebuliba, University of Eswatini (Swaziland), The Kingdom of Eswatini (Swaziland).

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olympica Sarma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kiran Kotyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (John Atsu Agbolosoo, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation and Quality Evaluation of Breakfast Cereals from Acha, Bambara Groundnut and Carrot Composite Flours

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Pranay Sadawarti, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Subhash Prasad, College of Dairy Science, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pranay Sadawarti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhash Prasad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA