Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhawna Bhagat, Ranchi Agriculture College, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ibrahim Iro Ibrahim, Federal College of Forest Resources Management, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhawna Bhagat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ibrahim Iro Ibrahim, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Maka Jishkariani, Georgian Technical University (GTU), Georgia.

(2) Asok Kumar Ghosh, Jadavpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maka Jishkariani, Georgia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asok Kumar Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora,  Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Naeem, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Lahiru Madushan Pandi Gamage, China Medical University, Sri Lanka.

(3) Mahfut, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Shafi, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Naeem, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lahiru Madushan Pandi Gamage, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1)Dr. Jichao Sun, Associated Professor, China University of Geosciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhiram Reddy Anireddy, United States of America.

(2) Arkar Htet, Mullion Façade Engineering School, Myanmar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

(2) Mohamed H. Shaban, Homs University, Al-Baath University previously, Syria.

(3) Raghunath Kashyap Karanam, Michigan State of University , United States.

(4) Satpal, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhiram Reddy Anireddy, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arkar Htet, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Salahuddin Rahaman, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Bangladesh.

(2) Yash Sailesh Kumar, Tbilisi State Medical University, Georgia.

(3) Ramazan Aslan, Bilecik Training and Educatian Hospital, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Doniparthi Pradeep, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salahuddin Rahaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yash Sailesh Kumar, Georgia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ramazan Aslan, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abbas Hashim Almaidi, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, University of Maysan, Iraq.

(2) Popa Alin, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Abbas Hashim Almaidi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Popa Alin, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Sharma, Agriculture University Jodhpur, India.

(2) Partha Pratim Kalita, Assam down town University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farooq Ahmad Khan, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), India.

(2) Mykola Kovalov, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankita Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Partha Pratim Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Padam Singh, VCSG UUHF Bharsar, India.

(2) Manish kumar, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padam Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fortunato Garza Ocañas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

(2) Mahrous Abd El-baset Attia, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) S. Vishnupriya, Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Audu Muhammad Abba Isah, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

(2) Prabha, Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fortunato Garza Ocañas, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahrous Abd El-baset Attia, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vishnupriya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Flora, St. Mary’s College (Autonomous), Thoothukudi,, India.

(2) Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.Chitra, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, India.

(2) Radka Bozhinova, Agricultural Academy, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Bulgaria.

(3) Shubham Yadav, Sardar Vallabhbhai Pate University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(4) Swatantra Yadav, CSAUA&T, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Flora, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA