Peer Review History: Evaluation of Physico-chemical and Biochemical Parameters of Sugarcane Molasses and Cashew Apple Juice from Six Locations in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Eugene Yahaya, Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eugene Yahaya, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges and Management of Open Abdomen in Resource-limited Settings: A Case Report of a Morbidly Obese Patient with Mesenteric Panniculitis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rolando Dornes Ramon, The Cuban Hospital, Qatar.

(2) Shameel Musthafa, Qatar.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rolando Dornes Ramon, Qatar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shameel Musthafa, Qatar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Stroke Awareness among Future Educators: A Study of Science Education Students in Colleges of Education, Enugu State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Medicine and Health Sciences Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Moitry Chakraborty, Mymensingh College of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences (affiliated from the medicine faculty of Dhaka University), Bangladesh.

(2) Nakka Surya Teja, Kiran College of Nursing, Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moitry Chakraborty, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nakka Surya Teja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Blended and Social-emotional Learning into Science Education for Quality Enhancement

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Nasser Mustapha, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

Reviewers:

(1) Michail Kalogiannakis, University of Thessaly, Greece.

(2) Ruben Dario Cardenas Espinosa, Unversidad de Caldas, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Michail Kalogiannakis, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruben Dario Cardenas Espinosa, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 4 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Visual Attention and Useful Field of View in Driving: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Nancy, Vinayaka Mission’s Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Abdullah Muhammad Al-Kamal, Airlangga University, Indonesia.

(3) Dyson Galatia, Zambia

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Konstantinos Karagiannis, Greece.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Nancy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullah Muhammad Al-Kamal, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dyson Galatia, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Animal Manure Combined with Biochar on Plant Growth and Yield in Pinched Seedling of African Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Pusa Narangi Gainda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehdi Dahmardeh, Zabol University, Iran.

(2) Evelyn Q. Alera, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sonu Kumari Sheoran, CCS HAU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehdi Dahmardeh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Evelyn Q. Alera, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Assessment of Queuing Networks with Intermittently Accessible Servers, Failed Servers, Corrective Maintenance, Feedback, and Customer Abandonment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jacek Dziok, University of Rzeszow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Suresh Babu Chandolu, Dhanekula Institute of Engineering & Technology, India.

(2) Bebittovimalan A, St. Joseph’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asma Anjum, HKBK College of Engineering, India.

(2) Chandra Shekhar, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani Campus, India.

(3) Katta Lakshmi Narasimhamu, Mohan Babu University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suresh Babu Chandolu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bebittovimalan A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Growth Performance of Indian Major Carps and Exotic Carps in an Aquaponics System with Cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivani Sharma, Maharishi Markandeshwar (deemed to be) University, India.

(2) Raghvendra Niranjan, Dr. Hari Singh Gour University Sagar M.P, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivani Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghvendra Niranjan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: On Supra∗ Generalized Closed and Open Sets in Supra Bitopological Spaces

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tomasz Witczak, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland.

(2) P.Padma, Prist University, India.

(3) Saikh Shahjahan Miah, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tomasz Witczak, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P.Padma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saikh Shahjahan Miah, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Vanishing Art of ‘Pothi Bacha’ in Rural Odisha: Oral Storytelling as a Sacred Tradition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Funmilola Kemi Megbowon, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

(2) J. Lalitha Sridevi, VNRVJIET, India.

(3) Murad A. Tamimi, An-Najah National University, Palestine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Srivastava, Shivaji College, India.

(2) Kumkum Sharma, IIS (Deemed to be University), India.

(3) Mohmad Ashraf Bhat, Jazan University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(4) Parishmita Kakati, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India.

(5) Raamesh Gowri Raghavan, India.

(6) Shashi Gupta, India.

(7) Sourima Ghosh, Presidency University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Funmilola Kemi Megbowon, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Lalitha Sridevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Murad A. Tamimi, Palestine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA