Peer Review History: To What Extent Does Science Support the Recommendation of Cupping Therapy for Migraines? A Step toward Creating Guidelines Based on Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sachin Kumar Jain, Oriental University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suleyman Ersoy, University of Health Sciences, Turkiye.

(2) Amit Gupta, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Anitha B, Vivekananda Nursing Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suleyman Ersoy, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anitha B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Teaching Learning Practices and its Challenges in Achieving Quality Education: A Study on Tertiary Education Institutions in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sermin Agrali Ermis, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkiye.

(2) Diego da Silva, UniEnsino, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Indah Sari S.S, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia.

(2) Jarrah Mohammad Mahmood Al-Jarrah, Islamic University of Minnesota, USA.

(3) Silvio Felipe Barbosa de Lima, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Brazil.

(4) Vani.R, Sri Devaraj  Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sermin Agrali Ermis, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diego da Silva, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Neha Munjal, Lovely Professional University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Diwash Kapil Chettri, Medhavi Skills University, India.

(2) Satya Kiranmai Tadepalli, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology(A), India.

(3) Archana Balkrishna Yadav, Gujarat Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.A. Thilina Kavinda, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(2) Sahar Fouad Majeed, Baghdad University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Diwash Kapil Chettri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satya Kiranmai Tadepalli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Archana Balkrishna Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategic Regulatory Compliance and Service Delivery in Uganda’s State-owned Energy Sector: A Case Study of Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Poornima, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Zhigao, Liao, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, China.

(3) Guillermo Domínguez Librado, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adegbola, Adeyinka Ayoade, LAUTECH, Nigeria.

(2) Hailu Regassa Bedane, Salale University, Ethiopia.

(3) Sukhendu Jana, Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Poornima, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zhigao, Liao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guillermo Domínguez Librado, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leadership Styles and Internal Communication Satisfaction as Predictors of Employee Commitment in Commercial Banks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Thu Thi Nguyen, Western Sydney University, Australia.

(2) Abdilkerim Asrar Seman, Werabe University, Ethiopia.

(3) Shaloo Manocha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thu Thi Nguyen, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdilkerim Asrar Seman, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shaloo Manocha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hospitalizations Due to Covid-19 in a Public Hospital of Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeevan Kumar Sharma, India.

(2) D Neha, Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Science, India.

(3) Rajkumari Vidyabati Devi, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(4) Peyman Esmaeili-Shahzade-Ali-Akbari, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeevan Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Neha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajkumari Vidyabati Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Peyman Esmaeili-Shahzade-Ali-Akbari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Epidemiological Profile of Leprosy in the State of Pará between the Years 2019 and 2023

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fabrício M. de Almeida, UFRO, Brasil.

(2) Ruma Devi, Lakhimpur College of Veterinary Science, AAU, India.

(3) Gaurav Bhatnagar, Maharashtra Institute of Physiotherapy, India.

(4) Zainab Sahib A. Quraish, Al Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fabrício M. de Almeida, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruma Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gaurav Bhatnagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Zainab Sahib A. Quraish, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Suitable Tree Species for Biochar Production and Their Performance in Enriching Soil Quality and Plant Growth of Oryza sativa L. and Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Ex Benth

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arthur Fernandes Goncalves, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Brazil.

(2) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aashish Gyawali, Nepal.

(2) A. Marais, South Africa.

(3) Judith Frimpong-Manso, CSIR-Soil Research Institute, Ghana.

(4) S.Mohandas, Agrl. College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agrl. University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arthur Fernandes Goncalves, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Satisfaction with the Quality of Educational Services in the BS Mathematics Graduates, College of Science, University of Eastern Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Princess L. Varona, Saint Michael College of Caraga, Philippines.

(2) Faiza binti Omar, IJN College, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akram M. ALhamad, Karabuk University, Turkey.

(2) Yuniana Cahyaningrum, Indonesian Art Institute Surakarta, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Princess L. Varona, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Faiza binti Omar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding the Digital Generation: The Role of Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction in Users’ Acceptance Intention of the Ruangguru Application among Generations Y, Z and Alpha

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Elizer M. Rebucas, Tagum City College of Science and Technology Foundation Inc, Philippines.

(2) Kadek Wiweka, Sahid Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(3) Anupam Chanda, Bahona College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yasir Awad Ahmed, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Manel Mizab, Tebessa University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elizer M. Rebucas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kadek Wiweka, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anupam Chanda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA