Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Evaluating the Efficiency of Microorganism-enriched Vermicompost on Potato Yield and Growth Parameters in Bahadurpur, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, College of Veterinary Science & A.H., Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Salvator Kaboneka, University of Burundi, Burundi.

(2) Bilqees Fatima, GC University Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Selomon Afework Yenesew, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salvator Kaboneka, Burundi) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bilqees Fatima, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Selomon Afework Yenesew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Survey for Natural Incidence of Diseases in Rabi Soybean in Telangana, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Vineeth M, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, India.

(2) Yashowardhan Singh, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

(3) Shital Sanjay Dhawan, Dr Sharadchandra Pawar College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vineeth M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yashowardhan Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shital Sanjay Dhawan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effects of Rock Phosphate, Farmyard Manure, and Vermicompost on Growth, Yield, and Soil Quality in Field Cultivation of Chickpea

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Bidai Yasmina, Oran 1 University, Algeria.

(2) Shani Gulaiya, Galgotias University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bidai Yasmina, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shani Gulaiya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Using Sentinel 1A (SAR) and Sentinel 2 Data for Assessing Water Spread Dynamics and Crop Diversification in Lower Palar Sub Basin, Tamil Nadu, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shashikant Verma, National Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Widodo Brontowiyono, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shashikant Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Widodo Brontowiyono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Exploring the Association of Socio-Economic Factors with Knowledge of Eco-Friendly Farming Practices among Vegetable Growers in Madhya Pradesh, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Pallavi Deokate, College of Agriculture, VNMKV, India.

(2) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.

(3) Utpal Barman, Assam Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pallavi Deokate, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prashant Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Utpal Barman, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Impact of Foliar Application of Nutrients and Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield, and Profitability of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Asam Raza, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) A. P. Gowsalya Devi, The Standard Fireworks Rajaratnam College for Women, India.

(2) Garima Pathak, B.D.College, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. P. Gowsalya Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garima Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Inorganic Fertilizer, Vermicompost and Biofertilizer on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalavati Prajapati, Shri. P.H.G. Muni. Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Ghada Sasi, School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kalavati Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghada Sasi, UK) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Depression and Chronic Kidney Disease: Risk Factors and Predictors in Nigerian Patients

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Monique Lynch-Jonah, The University of the West Indies, Jamaica.

(2) A. K. M Shahidur Rahman, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monique Lynch-Jonah, Jamaica) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. K. M Shahidur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA