Peer Review History: Effect of Factitious and Natural Prey on the Development of Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University,Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Shravan Kumar, PJTAU, India.

(2) Momodu Jalloh, Eastern Technical University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone.

(3) M.D Eqbal Ahmad, T.M Bhagalpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Agriculture research centre, Egypt.

(2) R. D. Dodiya, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Shravan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Momodu Jalloh, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.D Eqbal Ahmad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farmers’ Perception of Climate Change Vulnerability in Dryland Telangana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manisha Khulbe, Netaji Subhash University of Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Phodie Musa Kamara, Sierra Leone.

(2) Nshimba Ngoy Kayaya Juiskalyd, Texila American University, Cameroon.

(3) Prafullakumar Vasantrao Patil, MAFSU, Nagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anani Ogou, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences of the University of Dschang, Cameroon.

(2) Aneesh Joseph, IGNOU, India.

(3) Moges Tariku Tegenu, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

(4) Setiasih, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti Pembangunan, Indonesia.

(5) Tagesse Tadesse Masebo, Wachemo University, Ethiopia.

(6) Vinicius Teixeira do Nascimento, National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Phodie Musa Kamara, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nshimba Ngoy Kayaya Juiskalyd, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prafullakumar Vasantrao Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Empirical Study of Farmers’ Knowledge and Attitudes toward Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Palnadu District of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem ,National Research Centre, Dokki-Giza, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravonjiarison Nasandratra, Stanford University, USA.

(2) Anamika Sharma, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Akriti Vigya, UP Autonomous College, Varanasi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravonjiarison Nasandratra, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anamika Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akriti Vigya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Dragon Fruit Leather (Red-fleshed) by Using Peel as a Byproduct Waste Utilization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao,Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Hamdan Rashid, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Worachest Pirompugd, Burapha University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Hamdan Rashid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Worachest Pirompugd, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Some Fixed Point Results on G-(E.A.) Property of Integral Type Mappings in G-Metric Spaces

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rachana Pathak, University of Lucknow, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Kumar, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Rita Pal, Atharva University, School of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) R.Ramesh, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rita Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: OPTIMIZATION OF GINGER AND HONEY BASED WINE PRODUCTION USING SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujata Upadhyay, Sikkim University, India.

(2) Theodoros A. Markopoulos, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece.

(3) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) EO. Oyetola, Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria.

(2) Raghda M.Ameer, Al-Furat Al-Awsat University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujata Upadhyay, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theodoros A. Markopoulos, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dietary Supplementation of Selected Feed Additives and Its Effects on Growth Performance, Survival and Digestive Enzyme Activity in Whiteleg Shrimp, Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Shadab Siddiqui, Shri Krishna University, India.

(2) Shiffa Ul Ain, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(3) Guillermo Martín Caille, National University of Patagonia San Juan Bosco , Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alal George Wasonga, University of Eldoret, Kenya.
Guillermo Martín Caille, National University of Patagonia San Juan Bosco (UNPSJB), Argentina.

(2) Hamet Diaw DIADHIOU, Senegal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shadab Siddiqui, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiffa Ul Ain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guillermo Martín Caille, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biotechnological Strategy for the Valorisation of Feather Waste Using Keratinolytic Actinobacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) R.Lukas Martindro Satrio Ari Wibowo, Indonesia.

(2) Julian Cruz Olivares, Autonomous University , Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Walaa Abdel-Kader Ramadan Ibrahim, Biotechnology Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.Lukas Martindro Satrio Ari Wibowo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Julian Cruz Olivares, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pollen Morphology as a Diagnostic Tool for delimitation of Curcuma decipiens and Curcuma inodora: Two Allied endemic species from Peninsular India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mandaloju Venkateshwarlu, Kakatiya University, India.

(2) Parinita Tripathy, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Ralitsa Balkanska, Institute of Animal Science, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tatiana Romanishina, Polissia National University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mandaloju Venkateshwarlu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parinita Tripathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ralitsa Balkanska, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Multi-micronutrient Mixture Grades on Yield and Chemical Composition of Soybean (Glycine max)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahaf Wail Mahmoud, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) B. Thendral Hepsibha, University of Madras, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shama Afroze Baig, Swami Shri Swaroopanand Saraswati Mahavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahaf Wail Mahmoud, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Thendral Hepsibha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA