Peer Review History: Fish species composition and diversity assessment in the Roseries reservoir, Sudan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) M.R.Rajan, The Gandhigram Rural Institute, INDIA.

(2) Delara Sepehrfar, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan.

(3) Manjulesh Pai, College of Fisheries, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar, Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

(2) Andie john d. Tadeo, Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University, Philippines.

(3) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

(4) Ritisnata Nayak, ICAR- Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

(5) Wayan Kantun, Institute of Technology and Maritime Business, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.R.Rajan, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Delara Sepehrfar, Gorgan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manjulesh Pai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural Waste Annona squamosa L. Young Fruit Extract: Preparation and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Poletto, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Shoaib Maqbool, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (UAF), Pakistan.

(2) Karuppiah Nagaraj, National Forensic Sciences University, India.

(3) R.M.Y.D. Rathnayaka, Wayamba University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Shoaib Maqbool, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karuppiah Nagaraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.M.Y.D. Rathnayaka, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: ASHA’s are Empowered Feminist Workers in Indian Healthcare Sector: Truths and Myths from Case Studies in West Bengal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampoornam. W, Bhavani College of Nursing, India.

(2) Karandeep Singh Sandhu, National Dental College and Hospital, India.

(3) Cristian Andres Yanez, USA.

(4) Mohammad Aatif, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saurabh Mishra, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampoornam. W, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karandeep Singh Sandhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cristian Andres Yanez, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohammad Aatif, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Groundwater Quality and Potential Non-carcinogenic Health Risk Around Epie Creek, Yenagoa, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Asst. Prof. Natt Makul, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Rubina Sahin, NMDC Dav Polytechnic College, India.

(2) Margaret Mwikali Keli, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(3) Salim Khoso, University of British Columbia, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Darshna B. Joshi, Government Polytechnic Gandhinagar, India.

(2) Kafando Halidou, Joseph Ki-Zerbo University & UTG, Burkina Faso.

(3) Mojtaba G. Mahmoodlu, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.

(4) Salim Khoso, University of British Columbia, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rubina Sahin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Margaret Mwikali Keli, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Salim Khoso, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Treatment of Industrial Wastewater by Homogeneous Fenton Oxidation: Application to Textile Effluents

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Romuald Teguia Doumbi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

(2) Aryan Upadhyay, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Getasew Yehuala Gezahegn, Ethiopia.

(2) T.Sundar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Romuald Teguia Doumbi, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aryan Upadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Three Bacterial Strains Isolated from Textiles Sewage and Observation of Their Biodegradation Efficiency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Neena Singla, Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinit Singh Baghel, Guru Ghasidas University, India.

(2) Karuna Rajaram Pawar, Vishwasrao Naik Arts, Commerce and Baba Naik Science Mahavidyalaya, India.

(3) Suneeti Gore, Fergusson College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Israa Salma Dalas, College of Education for Pure Science, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(2) Ranjan Singh, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinit Singh Baghel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karuna Rajaram Pawar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suneeti Gore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Response, Nutrient Utilization and Viscerosomatic and Hepatosomatic Indices of Nile Tilapia (O. niloticus) Linnaeus 1758, Fed at Various Inclusion Levels of Raw and Soaked Sprouted Elephant Ear Plant (E. cyclocarpum) Leaf in Substitute for Soybean Meal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora, Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya Kiran Kokani, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Ronald V. Constantino, Our Lady of Fatima University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Oluwamuyiwa Oje, National Biotechnology Research And Development Agency, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya Kiran Kokani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ronald V. Constantino, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Transitioning from INSET to CPD: A 70-Year Exploration of Teachers Professional Development in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Magesh, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Stamatios Papadakis, University of Crete, Greece.

(2) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

(3) Hijrawatil Aswat, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lea l. Casane, University of Eastern Philippines Laoang Campus, Philippines.

(2) Philip Donald P. Herrera, Cebu Institite of Technology-University, Philippines.

(3) Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay M.Hum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stamatios Papadakis, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hijrawatil Aswat, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Contemporary Analytical Study of CAMELS Indicators and Financial Performance Variations Among Indian Public Sector Banks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

(2) Dr. Chan Sok Gee, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Peace Aludogbu, New Mexico State University, USA.

(2) Sakshi Raghuvanshi, University of Lucknow, India.

(3) Nura Sadiq, Katsina State Institute of Technology and Management, Nigeria.

(4) Hakan Acer, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cedrick Agorbia-Atta, United States of America, America.

(2) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman  University, Turkey.

(3) Jenson Jonathan, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(4) Kalavathi Ramesh, Vivekananda Institute of Management, India.

(5) Ravi Agarwal, Government Degree College, India.

(6) Robb Shawe, Capitol Technology University, USA.

(7) Timothy t. Ugoh, University of New Brunswick, Canada.

(8) Yiming He, South China University of Technology, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peace Aludogbu, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sakshi Raghuvanshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nura Sadiq, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hakan Acer, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey Questionnaire: Perio-Esthetics in Periodontology of PG Students Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya Saxena, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences Faridkot, India.

(2) Aruna Namdev Daware, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ilakiya.M, Mgr University, India.

(2) Mamta Singh, Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aruna Namdev Daware, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA