Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Constraints and Suggestions Expressed by Flower Growers in Chikkaballapur District, Karnataka, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akbari Nirav Rameshbhai, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anayatullah Nayaji, Ch.B.P. Government Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yabesh Abraham Durairaj Isravel, Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering & Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akbari Nirav Rameshbhai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anayatullah Nayaji, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Governance Models for Safe Deployment and Fine-Tuning of Generative AI in Enterprise Security and Data Protection

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sai Bharath Sannareddy, USA.

(2) Roshan Kakarla, United states.

(3) Koteswara Rao Chirumamilla, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chahat Malhotr, Vivekananda institute of Professional Studies, India.

(2) Hara Krishna Reddy Koppolu, CSG Systems International, USA.

(3) Kishore Challa, USA.

(4) Nsisong Louis Eyo-Udo, Ulster University London & Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sai Bharath Sannareddy, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roshan Kakarla, United states) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Koteswara Rao Chirumamilla, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Quantifying the Influence of Soil Condition, Topography and Land Use on Soil Loss in a Watershed in Phuleng-e-Nyane, Lesotho

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shagun Sengupta, University of Michigan Alumni, US State.

(2) Zia Ur Rehman, Osmania Government College, Pakistan.

(3) Sherein El-Shahat, Nile Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, Egypt

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ekta Madan, DebreBerhan University, Ethiopia.

(2) Eli Pavlova-Traykova, Forest Research Institute at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(3) Shagun Gupta, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shagun Sengupta, US State) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zia Ur Rehman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sherein El-Shahat, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Inter-State Disparities in Female Educational Attainment in India: A Composite Index Based Analysis Using NFHS-V Data

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tauqeer Abdullah, University of Peshawar, Pakistan.

(2) Nighat Gul, The University of Haripur, Pakistan.

(3) Saima Haleem, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fatima Sharif, Quide-Azam-University Islamabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tauqeer Abdullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nighat Gul, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saima Haleem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Integrating Sustainability and Innovation: A Comprehensive Review of Organic Farming Practices for Nutrient-Rich Fruit and Horticultural Crop Production in India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivani Sharma, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Abhishek Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Garba Hani danladi, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivani Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Microbial and Antibiogram of Post Caesarean Section Puerperal and Wound Sepsis at a Teaching Hospital in Southern Nigeria

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhumika Panchal, Parul Institute of Pharmacy , India.

(2) Nagarjuna D , Akshaya Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Hope Akegbe, University of Notre Dame, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amina Turki, Osmania University, India.

(2) Fattma A.Ali, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhumika Panchal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagarjuna D, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hope Akegbe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Salt Concentration on the Production of α-Amylase and Protease by Bacillus coagulans and Wastewater Treatment Potential

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Christopher Cullis, Case Western Reserve University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Damini R. Motwani, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur Universitry Nagpur, India.

(2) Kazy Mohammad Iqbal Hossain, Bangladesh University of Professionals (BUP), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdolmajid  Fadaei, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Sergej Uljanov, University “Union – Nikola Tesla” in Belgrade, The Republic of Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Damini R. Motwani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kazy Mohammad Iqbal Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing Structural Capacity and Performance of Two – Way Concrete Slabs Reinforced with Reused GFRP Bars for Sustainable Construction

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rachid Masrour, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Nada Mother Al-Nedawi, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(2) Manoj Varma Lakhamraju, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abbas Mahde Abd, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nada Mother Al-Nedawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Varma Lakhamraju, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability and Trait Correlations in Sesame Genotypes Using Morphological Characters

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruhul Amin, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(2) Zeinab Alywe Mohammed Al-Tememe, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kuna Karthik, YSRHU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruhul Amin, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zeinab Alywe Mohammed Al-Tememe, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: An Analysis of Total Factor Productivity Growth of Chick Pea in Maharashtra, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dervis Ozturk, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkiye.

(2) Mohammad Gulab Omari, Nangarhar University, Afghanistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aqeel Johni Nassir, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dervis Ozturk, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Gulab Omari, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA