Peer Review History: Impact of Maternal Education, Maternal Job, Residence and Family Economic Status on Childhood Vaccination in Anbar Province

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Manipal college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tun Win Lat, Myanmar.

(2) D Bhuvaneshwari, DRNTRUHS, India.

(3) Eren Guzeloglu, University of Health Sciences Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoglu City Hospital, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bdn. Kusumastuti, Muhammadiyah Gombong University, Indonesia.

(2) Mohamed Belomaria, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(3) Polepalli Vamsee Krishna, Santhiram medical college, DR Ntr university of health sciences, India.

(4) Sura Dewachi, Ninevah University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tun Win Lat, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Bhuvaneshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eren Guzeloglu, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination and its Associated Human Health Risks in the Nun River, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golam Mustafa,, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Fahad Abro , Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Noor Zulfiqar , University of Agriculture Faisalabad , Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Fahad Abro, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noor Zulfiqar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Immunohistochemistry and Histology Evaluation of Neurodevelopmental and Neurocognitive Changes in the Offspring of Depressed Mice Administered Paroxetine Prenatally

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Grishma D. Zalavadiya, Dr. Subhash University, India.

(2) Shivani Pannu, Gateway College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Constance Chifamba, Solusi University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Rajveer Singh Rathore, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Rima Benatoui, Applied Neuroendocrinology Laboratory, Annaba University, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Grishma D. Zalavadiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivani Pannu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A systematic Review of Prompt Engineering for responsible use of GenAI in K-12 schools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Deepa, NGM College, India.

(2) Norshadila Binti Ahmad Badela, Information Technology Unit Kolej Komuniti Sungai Siput, Malaysia.

(3) Josan D. Tamayo, Centro Escolar University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Deepa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Norshadila Binti Ahmad Badela, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Josan D. Tamayo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Background Ionization Radiation (BIR) of Rumuagholu Town in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Khalil KASSMI, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Anatolii Semenov, Poltava State Agrarian University, Ukraine.

(2) Wael Abdalla Aziz Elhelece, Egypt.

(3) Saptarshi Gupta, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anteneh Yesigat, Kotebe University of Education, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anatolii Semenov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wael Abdalla Aziz Elhelece, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saptarshi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Abdominal Trauma at Three Hospitals in the Western Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Reza Shahraki, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran.

(2) Sorin Paun, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(3) Soya Xavier, Saveetha Dental College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmad Reza Shahraki, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sorin Paun, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Soya Xavier, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Evaluation of Cakes from Wheat, Acha, and Coconut Residue Flour Blends

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Anatolii Semenov , Poltava State Agrarian University ,Ukraine.

(2) Enrico Medina, Western Mindanao State University Zamboanga City, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Huma Parveen, IFTM University, India.

(2) Natwalinkhol Settapramote, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thailand.

(3) Olha Hrynchenko, Kharkiv State University of Food Technologies and Trade, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anatolii Semenov, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Enrico Medina, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy Assessment of Enzyme-enriched Diets for Production Performance and Flesh Quality of Catla catla

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abha Jha, BNMU, India.

(2) Akhil Kumar S, University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Muadassar Shahzad, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abha Jha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akhil Kumar S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence Mechanism of Global E-commerce on India’s Electronic Product Export Trade: Strategy, Policy and Competitive Advantage

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Seun Michael Oyekunle, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

(2) A. Sujatha, Cardamom Planters’ Association College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Martha Silvia Torres Hidalgo, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México.

(2) Renil Septiano, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi KBP, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seun Michael Oyekunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Sujatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Remote Work Policies, Workplace Flexibility, and Organizational Culture on Employee Productivity: A Study of IT Professionals

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhamad Risal Tawil, Baubau Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) Tanuja Vikas Dubey, India.

(3) Aajaz Ahmad Hajam, Tashkent International University of Education, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rina Mudjiyanti, UniversitasMuhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia.

(2) Vanishri R Hundekar, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhamad Risal Tawil, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tanuja Vikas Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aajaz Ahmad Hajam, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA