Peer Review History: Multi-Environment Evaluation of Wheat Genotypes for Growth and Yield Attributes in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Shanthi Palaniappan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shanthi Palaniappan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Regional Dominance and Structural Transformation in Cucurbit Vegetables: A Two-Tier Analysis in Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José CebolaLidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyadarshani P Mohapatra, Central Agricultural University-Imphal, India.

(2) Prajith T. M, Sreekrishna College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyadarshani P Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prajith T. M,India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Nutritional Strategies for Enhancing Livestock Productivity: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Manish Pandey , ICAR-IARI, India.

(3) Marinela Enculescu, Research and Development Institute for Bovine Balotesti, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Addison Bitew, Andassa Livestock Research center, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

(2) P.Balasubramanian, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Tahani Badrul Munir, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zirak M R Palani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marinela Enculescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Postural Analysis of Rural Women Involved in Vegetable Cultivation in Jorhat District of Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaibhavi Khatavkar (PT), Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth-College of Physiotherapy, India.

(2) Joseph Mailutha, Kisii University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aelena Takhellambam, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Gokulakrishnan.J, Thanthai Roever College Of Physiotherapy, India.

(3) Izaidino Jaime Muchanga, Universidade São Tomás de Moçambique, Mozambique.

(4) Mayank Kumar, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaibhavi Khatavkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joseph Mailutha, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Atmospheric Response to India’s COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Satellite Assessment of Aerosols, Trace Gases, and Meteorological Influences

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Amale Laaroussi, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

(2) Anthony Akande, The Ohio State University, United States.l

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sukanta Sarkar, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amale Laaroussi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Akande, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating AI Influence on Candidate Authenticity: Risks, Ethics and Solutions for Modern Recruitment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Laxman Doddipatla, USA.

(2) Renebeth Gatudan Donguiz, Benguet State University (BSU), Philippines.

(3) Shankar Prasad Upadhyay, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bipin Kumar, Department of Economics, HNB Garhwal University, India.

(2) M. Geeta, K L University off campus, India.

(3) Vladimir Gorgadze, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Russia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laxman Doddipatla, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Renebeth Gatudan Donguiz, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shankar Prasad Upadhyay, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Meta Synthesis of Digital and AI Tools for Conceptual Understanding in Higher Mathematics Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bakare Kazeem Kayode, Albukhary International University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Alfi Rohmatul Azizah, Indonesia.

(2) Udobia Elijah Etukudo, Federal College of Education Technical, Rivers, State, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arikewuyo Debo Sulaimon, National Open University Of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Mahua Basu Mallik, Institute OF Education (P.G.) For Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alfi Rohmatul Azizah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udobia Elijah Etukudo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Seasonal Variations in Cool and Warm Temperature Extremes in Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Seemab Akhtar, National Institute of Advance Technology, Indian Institute of Science (Bengaluru), India.

(2) Salisu Lawal Halliru, Yusuf Maitama Sule Federal University of Education Kano, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kabiru Hamisu, SR University, Nigeria.

(2) Philippe Malick Dione, Assane Seck University, Senegal.

(3) Shani Gulaiya, SOAG, Galgotias University, India.

(4) Simon Stephen Mshelia, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

(5) Tusoing Alphonse Houmai H, National Dairy Research Institute, India.

(6) Shankar Lal Yadav, BBD Govt. PG College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seemab Akhtar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Lawal Halliru, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | JOURNAL CHANGE TO JGEESI from JSRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) Approach in Science Teaching: Assessing the Academic Performance of Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

(2) Dr. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Bingjie Wei, China.

(2) Suhazlan Bin Suhaimi, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eirini (Irene) Spanaki, University of Crete, Greece.

(2) Suja George Stanley, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bingjie Wei, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhazlan Bin Suhaimi, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Use of Endoguide in Accessing a Calcified Maxillary Canine Using CBCT Guided: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade And University Medical Center “Bezanijskakosa” Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Urvashi Bhimjibhai Sodvadia, Nova Southeastern University, United States.

(2) Ashima Agarwal, India.

(3) SURAJ GHANSHYAM MALPANI, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fatima Injela Khan, Institute of Dental Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Urvashi Bhimjibhai Sodvadia, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashima Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (SURAJ GHANSHYAM MALPANI, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA