Peer Review History: Gait Analysis of Children with Developmental Dysplasia of The Hip under 2 Years-old after Closed Reduction: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Midhun Krishnan, SK Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tanzila Zahid, Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan.

(2) Abhishek Sengupta, VMMC And Safdarjung Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tanzila Zahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Sengupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Isolation and Characterisation of Docosanoic Acid, Quercetin and Vitexin from Dennettia tripetala Bak. f. Root and Stem Bark and their In-vivo Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic Activities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zoran Todorovic, University of Belgrade And University Medical Center “Bezanijskakosa”, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Emeka Ugoala, Admiralty University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Nabanita Baruah, Gauhati University, India.

(3) Umar Itopa Sheriff, Morgan State University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emeka Ugoala, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabanita Baruah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Umar Itopa Sheriff, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Description of a New Species of Piezodorus sp. Fieber (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) from India with Identification Key

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Government College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo I. Faundez, Cape Horn International Center CHIC, Chile.

(2) Bio. Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Romania.

(3) Archana Hemant Patil, S.M.Joshi College Hadapsar, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gülten Yazici, Central Research Institute, Türkiye.

(2) Mehdi Dehghani Zahedani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eduardo I. Faundez, Chile) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bio. Iosob Gabriel-Alin, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Archana Hemant Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Morphometric and Reproductive Trends Reveal Near-Equal Sex Ratio, Positive Allometric Growth, and Early Maturity of Euthynnus affinis in Southern Philippine Waters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tarang Kumar Shah, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

(2) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State University of Sonora,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Endalh Mekonnen Mengistie, Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

(2) Abhishek Giri, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Endalh Mekonnen Mengistie, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Structural Equation Modeling on School Performance: Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction, and Work Commitment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheila mae O. Torquido, Medal Elementary School, Philippines.

(2) Anushree Banerjee, Sapthagiri NPS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheila mae O. Torquido, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anushree Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Parent-Teacher Learning Program and the Reading Performance of Grade 3 Pupils

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jerald Moneva, University of the Visayas, Philippines.

(2) Kelzang, Bhutan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jerald Moneva, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kelzang, Bhutan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Review of Customer Engagement Strategies in Digital Marketing for E-Business Growth

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Uma Gulati, Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(2) John Michael Ong Verzosa, Ateneo de Manila University – Graduate School of Business, Philippines.

(3) Vivek Birla, Maharana Pratap Group of Institutions, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uma Gulati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Michael Ong Verzosa, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vivek Birla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Travel to Border Destinations: Exploring the Motivations and Revisit Intentions of Tourists in Border Regions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharifah Zannierah Syed Marzuki, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(2) Shahzada Aamir Mushtaq, Times Institute, Multan, Pakistan.

(3) Reza Saboonchi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(4) Maryam Khaleghinejad, The Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Toma Smaranda-Nicoleta-Cristina, The National University of Science And Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Pitești University Centre, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharifah Zannierah Syed Marzuki, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahzada Aamir Mushtaq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Reza Saboonchi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Maryam Khaleghinejad, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Lighting the Path to Longevity: The Art of Light Curing Dental Composites – A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahima Panwar, I.T.S Centre For Dental Studies & Research, India.

(2) Prachi Pandey, RAMA University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahima Panwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prachi Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Analysis of Livelihood Systems of Small and Marginal Farmers in Rainfed Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Agrochemical Research Center, Federal Scientific Center of Vegetable Production, Russia.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Vishnu Shankar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Naveen Tariyal, College of Forestry Ranichauri, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Vishnu Shankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naveen Tariyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA