Peer Review History: Profile and Trends in Hospitalizations for Respiratory Diseases in Ananindeua-PA: Epidemiological Analysis (2013-2022)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Agarwal, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.

(2) Manjulakshmi P, KG College of Pharmacy and Research Institute, Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit Agarwal, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manjulakshmi P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Farmers’ Paticipation in Agriculture Based Projects: A Case of RIPAT Project In Morogoro, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sweta Sahoo, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Paul Chuks Okonkwo, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Mengesha Tesfaw Abay, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sweta Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Chuks Okonkwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mengesha Tesfaw Abay, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field Efficacy of Different Newer Insecticide Molecules against Litchi Seed Borer, Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley (Lepidoptera: Gracilariidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Kumar Garg, College of Agriculture, JNKVV, India
(2) S. Sambathkumar, Studied at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India
(3) Gayathri Devi S.S, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Kumar Garg, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sambathkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gayathri Devi S.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | Na


Peer Review History: Utilization Pattern of Milk and Milk Products by Different Consuming Units in Andhra Pradesh, India: A Comparative Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan

Reviewers:

(1) M. Selvakumar, Padmavani Arts and Science College for Women, India
(2) Avinash Mishra, Sanskriti University, India

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Selvakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avinash Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 1


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Establishment of In-vitro Cell Cultures Using Patient-derived Ascitic or Pleural Fluid from Cancer Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Durjoy Majumder, West Bengal State University, India
(2) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México

Reviewers:

(1) Xiaojing Chang, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China.
(2) Ganesh Davanam, Mohan Babu University, India.
(3) Riju Aikkal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Xiaojing Chang, China) | File 1  | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganesh Davanam, India) | File 1  | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Riju Aikkal, India) | File 1  | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1  | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1  | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Farm Women in Post Harvest Practices: An Analytical Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey

Reviewers:

(1) Kownin Abdimahad Ismael, Jigjiga University, Ethiopia.

(2) Sonam Roy, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kownin Abdimahad Ismael, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonam Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Parameters on Gas Turbine Performance Using Energy Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait

Reviewers:

(1) K Sunil Kumar, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

(2) Muthuraman Subbiah, College of Engineering and Technology, University of Technology and Applied Sciences-Muscat, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muthuraman Subbiah, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of IBA, NAA and Rooting Media on Morphological Parameters of Stem Cuttings in Fig (Ficus carica L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China

Reviewers:

(1) Ghodake Balkrushna Dattatray, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Magdi Ismaiel Abdelaziz Saif, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghodake Balkrushna Dattatray, India) | File 1| NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Magdi Ismaiel Abdelaziz Saif, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Different Types of Cuttings of Seedless Lemon to Indole Butyric Acid Levels on Propagation, Germination and Growth

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China

Reviewers:

(1) Shahad Basheer Bahedh, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Inam Ul Haq, Centre of Excellence for Olive Research & Training (CEFORT) at Barani Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahad Basheer Bahedh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Inam Ul Haq, Pakistan) |File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 1


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Nitrogen and Sulphur on Yield, Quality and Nutrients Content and Uptake of kharif Cotton

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehdi Taheri Asghari, Payame Noor University, Iran.

(2) Naresh Chaudhari, Ganpat University, India.

(3) Anchal Singh, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1| NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehdi Taheri Asghari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naresh Chaudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anchal Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA