Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Chohan, Coastal Agriculture Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Himanshu Verma, Surajmal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Chohan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himanshu Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Boris Boincean, National Centre for Research and Seed Production, Republic of Moldova.

(2) Manisha, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Boris Boincean, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Prince Sahu, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) SEPTAR Leinar, Research Station for Fruit Growing Constanta, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prince Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (SEPTAR Leinar, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Nadeem Ahmed Ramadan, Al-Hadba University, Iraq.

(2) Agapie Ovidia Loredana, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nadeem Ahmed Ramadan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agapie Ovidia Loredana, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt

Reviewers:

(1) Arup Khakhlari, Bodoland University, India.

(2) B. Vasantharaj David, India.

(3) Sourav Ghosh, Rai Technology University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arup Khakhlari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Vasantharaj David, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sourav Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Chethana CK, University of Agriculture Sciences, India.

(2) K. K. Chandel, Government Agriculture College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chethana CK, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. K. Chandel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cengiz Yucedag, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Bhowmick, Central University of Odisha, India.

(2) Hiranmayee Nayak, Odisha University Of Agriculture And Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Bhowmick, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hiranmayee Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagarjun P., Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) B. Rajendra Kumar, ANGRAU, Agricultural College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nagarjun P., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Rajendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yamini Gautam, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidhyalya, India.

(2) Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, University of Ebolowa, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yamini Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Toppo, Radha Govind University, India.

(2) Ayesha Siddiqua, SKCHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Toppo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayesha Siddiqua, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA