Peer Review History: Prioritisation of Promising Therapeutic Targets in Plasmodium falciparum Using in Silico Multi Criteria Scoring

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Indunil Karunarathna, Teaching Hospital Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka.

(2) Mkhayar Khaoula, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah-Fez University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:.

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Indunil Karunarathna, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mkhayar Khaoula, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compactness of pseudo-differential type operators involving fractional Fourier transform

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen,   The University of Iowa,  Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mykola Yaremenko, National Technical University of Ukraine, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine.

(2) V. Kumar, Ghent University, Belgium.

(3) Ahmed Buseri Ashine, Arsi University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mykola Yaremenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Kumar, Belgium) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahmed Buseri Ashine, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic and Technological Impacts of UAS-Bengaluru Crop Varieties on Karnataka Agriculture, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Debashis Mandal, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aman Tutlani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (SKUAST–K), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debashis Mandal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of Ocimum basilicum and Ocimum gratissimum Essential Oils and Their Emulsions against Selected Trichophyton species

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khadiga Mohamed Abu-Zied, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fabio Altieri, Sapienza University,  Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kaveri G.S., Shri Dharmasthala Manjunateeshwara University , India.

(2) Essoh Ayimba, Togo.

(3) Alex Sander Lopes da Silva, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kaveri G.S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Essoh Ayimba, Togo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alex Sander Lopes da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Amylases Production from Fonio Using Central Composite Design

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Viktar Lemiasheuski, Belarusian State University, Republic of Belarus.

Reviewers:

(1) Ikechukwu Iloh Udema, Nigeria.

(2) Samuel Kwatia, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Udema Iloh Ikechukwu, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ikechukwu Iloh Udema, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Kwatia, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Statistical Approach for Forecasting Maize Yield in India using ARIMA Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Chinye Samuel Mesike, Rubber Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Gnanasankaran Natarajan, Thiagarajar College, India.

(3) Remal Shaher Al-Gounmeein, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ni Gst.Ag.Gde Eka Martiningsih, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chinye Samuel Mesike, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gnanasankaran Natarajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Remal Shaher Al-Gounmeein, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic and Management Challenges of Myocardial Infarction in a Nigerian Primary Health Care Centre: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa)Concordia, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Ee Xuan Ping, Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

(2) R.Indumathi, CSE, India.

(3) N. Venkata Naga Jyothi, KL College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agustín Joison, Cordoba Catholic University, Argentina.

(2) Amjad Mahmood, Pakistan.

(3) Suhad Abdul Azeez Ibrahim, Al-Nahrain university, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ee Xuan Ping, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R.Indumathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N. Venkata Naga Jyothi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinicians’ Perspectives on Overactive Bladder Management with a Special Emphasis on Mirabegron Use in Indian Clinical Settings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Seyyed Shamsadin Athari, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Reviewers: 

(1) Alexandre Kyoshi Hidaka, Centro Universitario da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Brazil.

(2) Gholamreza Mesbah, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Jenny Elizabeth Arboleda Bustan, Hospital Metropolitano Quito-Ecuador, Quito.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chima G Ofoha , University of Jos , Nigeria.

(2) Farshad Banouei, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexandre Kyoshi Hidaka, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gholamreza Mesbah, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jenny Elizabeth Arboleda Bustan, Quito) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chemical, Functional and Sensory Characterization of Non-commercial Unripe Banana Based Blends for Healthy Custard Food

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikhil Digambar Solanke, Parul Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Sruthy P M, Nilgiri College of Arts And Science, INDIA.

(3) Celile Aylin Oluk, Eastern Mediterranean Agriculture Research Institute, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Khaloahmadi, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikhil Digambar Solanke, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sruthy P M, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Celile Aylin Oluk, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antifertility Activity of Mangifera indica Leaves in Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagwa Ibrahim Saad Abu-Zahra, Animal Health Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Nanneboyina Ankamma, Y.A. Government Degree College for Women, India.

(3) H. Manimaran, Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Dr. M.G.R. Fisheries College and Research Institute Ponneri, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nagwa Ibrahim Saad Abu-Zahra, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nanneboyina Ankamma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (H. Manimaran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA