Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Textiles: Innovations, Challenges and Applications for Health and Hygiene

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fabio Altieri, Sapienza University, Italy.

(2) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) K.V. Arunkumar, PSG College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Ranjit Namdeorao Turukmane, SVKM’s Narsee Monjee Institute of Management, India.

(3) Eman Mohamed El-Khatib, Textile Research and Technology Institute, National Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K.V. Arunkumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjit Namdeorao Turukmane, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eman Mohamed El-Khatib, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Impact of Varied Compost Rates on Arbuscular Mycorhhiza Fungi in Rhizosphere Soils of Capsicum chinense (Habanero Pepper)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) K Ashok Kumar, Osmania University, India.

(2) Mizan Maulana, National Islamic University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K Ashok Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mizan Maulana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Endotyping Cellular and Humoral Immunoreactivity against Pollen and Citrus Fruits in Patients with Non–IgE-mediated Rhinoconjunctivitis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cynthia Aracely Alvizo Baez, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Venugopal P, Government Medical College, India.

(2) Nitin Sharma, J.L.N. Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venugopal P, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nitin Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Stable Strains of Eri Silkworms (Samia ricini) for Commercial Silk Production under the Climate of Manipur

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Enas Moustafa Yousef Mohammed Elyamani, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Deepali Sambyal, Shoolini University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Enas Moustafa Yousef Mohammed Elyamani, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepali Sambyal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Heterobeltiosis and Inbreeding Depression in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicumL.) for Yield, Yield Attributes and Quality

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Salwa Abdel-Aziz Ezzat, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Rajesh J. Panchal, Madhav University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salwa Abdel-Aziz Ezzat, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh J. Panchal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Competence and Academic Performance of Student Parents in Higher Education: A Descriptive-Correlational Study

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Vlasta Hus, University of Maribor, Slovenia.

(2) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Usman Muhammad Tukur, Central South University, China.

(2) Prodeep Kumar Mondal, Central University of Punjab, India.

(3) Michael Funso Adaramola, Lagos State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usman Muhammad Tukur, China) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prodeep Kumar Mondal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Michael Funso Adaramola, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Optimizing Mathematics Learning: The Role of Teaching Strategies and Student’s Interests in Performance

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Associate Professor, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul Agmabire Akendita, AAMUSTED, Ghana.

(2) Gbenro Sunday, College of Education, IKERE-EKITI, Nigeria.

(3) Kayode Ezecheal Obafemi, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paul Agmabire Akendita, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gbenro Sunday, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kayode Ezecheal Obafemi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA