Peer Review History: Nutritional Evaluation of Guava (Psidium guajava) Leaves as a Sustainable Feed Resource for Livestock

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Amitava Roy, West Bengal University of Animal & Fishery Sciences, India.

(2) Opuogulaya, Richard, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amitava Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Opuogulaya, Richard, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Water Hyacinth Leaf Meal Supplementation on Water Quality and Flesh Protein of Pangasius (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) Catfish

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Iuri Moares Neyrão, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(2) Sangeetha M. Nair, ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iuri Moares Neyrão, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sangeetha M. Nair, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis and Structural Elucidation of a Novel Hetero-Dodecametallic Yttrium-Sodium Complex Based on EDTA: Insights into f/s-Block Coordination Chemistry

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Subhash Chandra Shrivastava, University of Allahabad, India.

(2) Majid Ali, University of Kohat, Pakistan.

(3) Luay Ali Khaleel, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subhash Chandra Shrivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Majid Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Luay Ali Khaleel, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Inventory and Taxonomy of the Loranthaceae of Cocoa Agrosystems in the Peri-urban Areas of Daloa, Centre-West, Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) EDAGBO, DAVID ENUWA, NATIONAL CENTRE FOR GENETIC RESOURCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, NIGERIA.

(2) Shrutika Dipesh Patil, Lokmanya Tila Institute of Pharmacy, INDIA.

(3) Ashish Kar, The Energy and Resources Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (EDAGBO, DAVID ENUWA, NIGERIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shrutika Dipesh Patil, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashish Kar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advanced Analytical Techniques for Microbial Detection in Poultry Processing: Enhancing Food Safety Compliance in the U.S.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Prabu, Marudhar Kesari Jain College for Women (Autonomous), India.

(2) Hanaa Salih Abd Ali Alrammah, University of Baghdad, Iraq and University of Plymouth, UK.

(3) Mohammad Zahid Mustafa, University of Balochistan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Prabu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanaa Salih Abd Ali Alrammah, Iraq, UK) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammad Zahid Mustafa, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Nutritional, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Chromolaena odorata Leaves

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Government College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gireesh Tripathi, Shri Krishna University, India.

(2) Joenil G. Frayco, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Philippines.

(3) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gireesh Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joenil G. Frayco, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perceived Stress, Sex, and Quality of Life among Academic University Staff in Lagos State: An Empirical Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Egbita Peace Unekwuojo, Salem University, Nigeria.

(2) K.Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

(3) Yousef Alarabiat, Amman Arab University, Amman-Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Egbita Peace Unekwuojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Sindhura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yousef Alarabiat, Amman-Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Multi-level Clustering Framework for Cybersecurity Risk Stratification in Healthcare: A Dynamic, Overlapping Approach to Threat Classification and Mitigation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Suresh, SRM Institute of Science & Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Chukwunweike, United Kingdom.

(2) Priyanka Neelakrishnan, Enterprise Cybersecurity Product Leader and Independent Researcher, United States of America.

(3) Anindya Bose, Brainware University, India.

(4) Sanjay Kumar, K L University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Chukwunweike, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyanka Neelakrishnan, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anindya Bose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sanjay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Access to Market Information for Smallholder Indigenous Chicken Farmers Improvement in Misungwi District, Mwanza Region, Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean Beguinot, University of Bourgogne, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Juma Mhina, Tengeru Institute of Community Development, Tanzania.

(2) Chala Duguma Olika, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Juma Mhina, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chala Duguma Olika, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Classroom Supervision Operation and Mutual Procedure of Public Elementary School Teachers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratan Sarkar, Prabhat Kumar College, India.

(2) Polycarp Omara, Muni University, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratan Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Polycarp Omara, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA