Peer Review History: Variability Studies in Diverse Germplasm of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Divyesh Vasava, India.

(2) Soumya Patel, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(3) B.L. Kumhar, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculrure University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G. Sri Hari, ANGRAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divyesh Vasava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soumya Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B.L. Kumhar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AGING STORY OF SEEDS- THE SCIENCE BEHIND SEED DETERIORATION

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Maria Serrano, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Duygu SARI, Akdeniz University, Turkey.

(2) Waqas Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(3) Basant Kumar Dadarwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashkan Asgari, University of Hormozgan, Iran.

(2) Junaedi, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia.

(3) Maria Helena de Aguiar Pereira e Pestana , ISCTE-iul. Lisbon University Portugal, Portugal.

(4) Sandhya Dhakal, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Duygu SARI, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waqas Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Basant Kumar Dadarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing cardamom price forecasting: integration of XG boost model for a robust ensemble model

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Jai Sankar, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Waqar Ahmed Khan, University of Sharjah, UAE.

(3) Fidelis Tanko, Federal Polytechnic Kaltungo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Kumar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Jai Sankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waqar Ahmed Khan, UAE) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fidelis Tanko, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes against Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hübner)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Nithish, SKLTGHU, India.

(2) Rajesh Rokkam, Andhra University, India.

(3) Mukesh Nitharwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Nithish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajesh Rokkam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mukesh Nitharwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of GRIT in Predicting Academic Achievement: A Study of Form Three Students in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Indah Juwita Sari, Indonesia.

(2) Enock MBENZA, The Democratic Republic of Congo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ailyan Saleem, Jinnah Government College, Pakistan.

(2) Usmeldi, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia.

(3) Vani.R, Sri Devaraj  Urs Academy of Higher Education And Research Centre, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Indah Juwita Sari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Enock MBENZA, The Democratic Republic of Congo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Remote Sensing and GIS for Irrigated Area Mapping in the Betwa River Basin, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hassane Bassirou, University of Lomé, Togo.

(2) Sasi. M, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anurag Tewari, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology Kanpur, India.

(2) Biliyaminu Ado, Jigawa State College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Humaira Nazir, Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan.

(4) Manoj Kumar Meher, MAA Manikeshwari University, India.

(5) Rajani Kant Awasthi, India.

(6) Saurabh Kumar Anuragi, Maulana Azad National Institute Of Technology, India.

(7) Souleymane Bengaly, University of Social Sciences and Management of Bamako (USSGB), Mali.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hassane Bassirou, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sasi. M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adaptive Multilevel Monte Carlo Method for Elliptic Eigenvalue Problem with Random Coefficients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Yegammai, Bharathiar University, India.

(2) Carlos Henrique Tognon, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil.

(3) Brett Teeple, University of Calgary, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bapan Kalita, The Assam Royal Global University, India.

(2) Carlos Henrique Tognon, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil.

(3) Dharmesh K. Katariya, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(4) D.Kalamani, Bharathiar University PG Extension and Research  Centre, India.

(5) Shadab Ahmad Khan, Integral University, Lucknow, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Yegammai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carlos Henrique Tognon, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Brett Teeple, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic diversity analysis in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes using SSR markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Huda Jasim M. Altameme, College of science for women, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Sanny C. Babera, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aleksey Troitsky, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.

(2) Mirela Irina Cordea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Huda Jasim M. Altameme, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanny C. Babera, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Federated Learning and Graph Neural Networks for Transmission System Stability: A Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence Framework for Smart Grids

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University. Alexandria. Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Pravin Sankhwar, USA.

(2) Alireza Zabihi, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bilal Abdullah Nasir, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pravin Sankhwar, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alireza Zabihi, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of the 2024 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension on a Population Sample with a Mean Age of 59 Years

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Shafi Rather, University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Mohammad Bagher Afshar Naseri, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aqsa Shahid, The University of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahid Shafi Rather, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Bagher Afshar Naseri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA